From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Oi2uX-0006uS-9V for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2010 10:15:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57C90E07F4; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5403BE0720 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (smer.tone.cz [89.250.247.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 923611B4181 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 10:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C5E83AA.3080109@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 12:15:06 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VG9tw6HFoSBDaHbDoXRhbA==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.7) Gecko/20100731 Thunderbird/3.1.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Council Agenda 20100809 rev 01 References: <4C5C61F6.3050108@gentoo.org> <20100807131630.GJ12708@hrair.al.intel.com> <20100807204832.GA21345@linux1> <20100808084607.175a483d@snowcone> <20100808085526.GL12708@hrair.al.intel.com> <20100808101001.703a51d3@snowcone> <20100808100534.GM12708@hrair.al.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <20100808100534.GM12708@hrair.al.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 0083264d-2772-4b5f-8d47-1f31d4d7cd39 X-Archives-Hash: e7dd00227e13000087424d48a7017aab -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dne 8.8.2010 12:05, Brian Harring napsal(a): > On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 10:10:01AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 01:55:26 -0700 >> Brian Harring wrote: >>> Put it to a vote then, rather than flaming every few months that g55 >>> solves all EAPI issues/world hunger. >>> >>> Seriously, if the people wanting g55 can't be bothered to try and >>> make their proposal accepted/official, than all they're doing is >>> trolling/flaming/bitching, and wasting other peoples time. >> >> GLEP 55 *was* put up for a vote, along with GLEP 54, on 20090514. GLEP >> 54 was accepted subject to GLEP 55 being approved. The vote on GLEP 55 >> was a tie. > > A tie, with a decision to revisit next meeting- the next meeting it > was decided that yes, g55 is addressing what can be considered a real > issue. And in the 14 months since then, no one has requested it be > voted on, or revisited. > > That's the thing; the quibbling in details is lovely, as is the > repeated rehashing of the same technical matter, over and over, but > the path required to get it approved is established. > > Push it to the council and ask for a vote. They drop it from their > plate, push it back to the council again. That route at least has the > chance of being productive. Hell, run for council if you're tired of > them dropping things. > > Instead we've got continual sniping over the damned glep instead of > taking the proactive steps. Either way, unless I get beat down by > the other council members this will be on the next council agenda. > > If it can be squeezed into the coming monday meeting, I'd prefer it, > but it's short notice I realize. > > ~harring We can nominate it for next meeting, but not this one, we cant asure that all members are aware of all details for glep-55 so they need some time to investigate them. Tom -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxeg6oACgkQHB6c3gNBRYd2NgCeJrmHrapWDHqpyXlnn8c+HLhJ xUoAoLDRfSRc+ejByoMQ/1v+0O1VyyEb =KGMd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----