From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Og4A4-0006Qk-2Q for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:11:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D10B6E07AF; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from earth.farbfinsternis.net (earth.farbfinsternis.net [87.118.98.117]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4587E07FA for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 23:10:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.26] (p4FD53B37.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.59.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by earth.farbfinsternis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8FFA3878004 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 01:20:04 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C575079.6080601@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 01:10:49 +0200 From: Matti Bickel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Reviving GLEP33 References: <4C569638.9000407@gentoo.org> <20100802111125.GA7233@hrair> <4C573B37.8020803@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3D4238F5AF5196A4F9B923A5" X-Archives-Salt: 0b79212c-6174-4e2f-beba-3e8d3be0657d X-Archives-Hash: 1f9e8ab21b4eda8ed0d925e375e60329 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3D4238F5AF5196A4F9B923A5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/03/2010 12:17 AM, David Leverton wrote: > On 2 August 2010 22:40, Matti Bickel wrote: >> On 08/02/2010 08:16 PM, David Leverton wrote: >>> If so, it sounds like what you really want is per-package eclasses >>> (maybe with elibs as well to hold the non-metadata code), which >>> aren't covered by GLEP33 but ought to be easy enough to add. >> >> It's actually covered by GLEP33: >> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0033.html#tree-restructuring >=20 > I interpreted that more as a way to organise the global eclasses Yes, I thought you were talking about them. Introducing eclasses into the rest of the tree - is that possible from the implementation side? That is, how can PMs support that w/o much hassle? Are there any speed considerations that need to be taken into account? I like the idea. Having dev-lang/php/php-common.eclass makes a lot more sense then putting it into ${PORTDIR}/include/eclass. PHP will still need global eclasses for PEAR and pecl stuff, so I like them moving forward, too. And hiding them into ${PORTDIR}/include/eclass/php/ might be a good first step. --------------enig3D4238F5AF5196A4F9B923A5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxXUHkACgkQfNMcoUhJ7GwEtACeI5yGqz+BPy8088xOvRWM6NgJ +CcAn0t7HhXBQSMoZhpm5Thmt9turHJx =2kbG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3D4238F5AF5196A4F9B923A5--