From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Og2yh-0004IJ-LB for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 02 Aug 2010 21:55:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34D0CE086F; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from earth.farbfinsternis.net (earth.farbfinsternis.net [87.118.98.117]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A59E083B for ; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:55:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.26] (p4FD53B37.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.59.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by earth.farbfinsternis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 369E2878004 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2010 00:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C573EBB.3080005@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 23:55:07 +0200 From: Matti Bickel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100713 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Reviving GLEP33 References: <4C569638.9000407@gentoo.org> <20100802211517.1f207d31@snowcone> In-Reply-To: <20100802211517.1f207d31@snowcone> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigFC4E8727E008681647760ACD" X-Archives-Salt: 44d7c246-d851-4457-b4bb-0c7439e3e85b X-Archives-Hash: b7b9a025357d25a2eff0ed3f4108eab1 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigFC4E8727E008681647760ACD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/02/2010 10:15 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Aren't you really after per-package eclasses, not elibs? Yes. I don't care whether the snippets may affect metadata. They already don't (at one time they did, but we got warned that that's illegal - that's why php-5.3 ebuilds have their metadata folded back into them). >> Instead of all the backwards-compatibility issues the GLEP deals with,= >> we could just sneak the implementation into EAPI4 and be done with it.= >=20 > No, you can't make global scope changes just in an EAPI without > screwing up user systems. You have to do the whole "wait several years"= > thing for them. Bad. So I guess it's back to ferring's "use a new directory not readable by old PMs" idea. GLEP55++, but having to wait several months for that and GLEP33 *on top* is not very motivation for me. --------------enigFC4E8727E008681647760ACD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxXPrsACgkQfNMcoUhJ7GwMewCfRr2Kg6rrR+P3Dy2EB0IovVz3 4VoAniGpwPfJAJ8lwryEsdYOR4yNgiKJ =rEVq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigFC4E8727E008681647760ACD--