From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41915-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1OaXuK-0002hS-I7
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:44:08 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F13FE0A99;
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:44:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3911BE0A85
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:43:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwb10 with SMTP id 10so2359960gwb.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=/1O7a9GQWZA4BZq0HK77NEdu0P3ThQxuR9qBIJaX24E=;
b=WEQfHzCclQcyS9pK2C8mUXs5hmrKeDIggZs6uiGuXyYyyFa/olvS+8IeM1l+v3byaO
yPzsrlYaBnWggxnAqInIVT1tyBj9H6GIxE825J8oV19cY/lRDMDbeKRxfYg89PrCYZfn
D9xzotQ79JRTweUXW1be9UuBQGbLFaojlwcQo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=tWMlNNM/05lSV2cBo21CAFSTI7pZozb1Q9BBOFMS0+LujQlviUlvckQWb51xWui5EA
8ZHyFs1SE3zzVPNTOy9Uwaurb4nzHXpzRt8Svu5Vc8B7IlqtDFeLjQ8pOe4PxGpL+CrO
9BMjBxNMihbLOLT8FAp36cR0a7YNruUBGK6a8=
Received: by 10.150.218.18 with SMTP id q18mr4016479ybg.92.1279475025726;
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-95-147-114.jan.bellsouth.net [98.95.147.114])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q25sm4576324ybk.18.2010.07.18.10.43.44
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Sun, 18 Jul 2010 10:43:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C433D4F.1090209@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:43:43 -0500
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100630 Gentoo/2.0.5 SeaMonkey/2.0.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Upcoming Council meeting on July 26th, 1900
UTC
References: <20100717220501.GA18099@linuxized.com> <20100717233326.GA28010@hrair> <4C427152.2090707@gentoo.org> <20100718080618.3ac114b3@gentoo.org> <AANLkTik4m-TrXufbCTXJpkruYY7ZOY1eHyNRA8EM_-1l@mail.gmail.com> <20100718162121.634932cd@gentoo.org> <4C431ECC.10409@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C431ECC.10409@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: ad70a824-75ee-4274-a008-16fe33c62ed1
X-Archives-Hash: a876e1d3958053b49c3592f676f9f7c0
Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote:
> On 07/18/2010 05:21 PM, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> =20
>> Hi,
>>
>> Theo Chatzimichos<tampakrap@gentoo.org>:
>>
>> =20
>>> On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Christian Faulhammer
>>> <fauli@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> =20
>>>> What about getting rid of -project?
>>>>
>>>> V-Li
>>>> =20
>>> WHAT? Why??
>>> =20
>> Because it is useless in my eyes. All discussion could also take
>> place here and most people mix it up anyway. The distinction is too
>> blurry.
>>
>> V-Li
>>
>> =20
> The "tone in gentoo" etc threads recently belonged to gentoo-project.
> Those threads are usually the ones that grow the longest. If people wan=
t
> those on gentoo-dev then gentoo-project is not needed. Granted most of
> the time the list is not that active but so are many other mailing list=
s
> we have. I don't think this is something we should have on the council
> agenda without the issues having had it's own thread (on gentoo-project
> according to current rules).
>
> Regards,
> Petteri
>
> =20
It always seemed to me that people want to send threads to -project for=20
them to just go away. Once a thread goes to -project, it just whithers=20
on the vine and nothing much happens. There may be a need for -project=20
but if almost no one is going to be there, there is no point sending=20
threads to it. Maybe developers should be required to subscribe to=20
-project so that even if a thread is sent there, they still get to see=20
the postings and deal with the issues that are being raised.
Dale
:-) :-)