From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OVqLn-0007wx-2f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 18:25:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E11841C02A; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55941C03C for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 199D23151A for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 18:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C3223CB.2020900@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 21:26:19 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass References: <201007051724.02971.Arfrever@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201007051724.02971.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF3AAAD60B5DABBA846BE01FE" X-Archives-Salt: dda21765-3aa9-4a94-95cb-c86c0ecbfc40 X-Archives-Hash: c0e6f2db0a7d17112d7980e353324dea This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF3AAAD60B5DABBA846BE01FE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/05/2010 06:23 PM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > These minor changes in python.eclass and distutils.eclass have been alr= eady > reviewed on alias of Gentoo Python Project. It's recommended to be fami= liar > with internals of current code before trying to understand these minor = changes. If you are looking for review on gentoo-dev you should include something on what the patch is supposed to do. > Suggestions about indentation and quoting will be rejected. >=20 Do you think our indentation rules don't concern you? In general the email reads like you are not really looking for feedback on the patch so why bother gentoo-dev at all? Regards, Petteri --------------enigF3AAAD60B5DABBA846BE01FE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMMiPQAAoJEPeUsk245Ozw+5IQAITVezXOjn+gCdqLmvpEbHB7 GzCXayVhFyC6QKQX02FdmF2m2SYmBr0woVmH0/Wu6s71Ef5dYFqrsgL7p2f80Q1K EBvZ8WxBPKm1WJAh6N3rxGUy79fDk/lFC0TINWbvToG+LXB2PqEMeQfD4aYH+jNh Hv9bBWXeFKUx0Td1LZ5KQsUbD09LATji8FpF2FwGl+i40vkrQaik0NfTEDfEnBaE ra4Um1Cz0XerUfVdJ+lzqzVY5WiUPDP2nclhj9+XBM0UtnW5drT2dff7TJGHWBlU EKTLeGmwiJP1bkqw9PFf4DlLnn1JBzdWDBltV+GV3vgwn/T50vcyqjL5iQrXZJsB PY3xiuaTls0FUyYB+u1ujdX0cnBiVZEbjN/W2IslkVGcswBBmR4rON6PjNnQsYDX 5QcqfVLo3g0gRhkccJ/b+SMXtFsBFcZhhkG0g/qWoF2XB5mxmPsVeq+OIkjnW0IU 8rff08p7AuZus4ltPX7+XGQ5GX1WhzzQwyZCdT2bv3KG/2voSJG7nlPobuvXJdY4 tii9/c6Klgzi/VH9FA2Ss9rP9hfz1IWc7tdOjnMq/YmFWMM7hssBYGWxfZt+zeXL WoiBgxIu6/BET5gYh/6onY5OAjqSdoj1QU4lKGHOxYRKFSJgybam8Sib/rdKbGUU VT5rDXASS0Mjqlu6OP1G =kJmI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF3AAAD60B5DABBA846BE01FE--