From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OVVWp-0002Ng-V3 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2010 20:11:04 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85854E0AAB; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:11:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0E7E0BB9 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (host-64-139-229-48.nctv.com [64.139.229.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DC661B4056 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2010 20:10:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C30EA89.4020806@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2010 15:09:45 -0500 From: "Jory A. Pratt" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100704 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The future of sys-apps/openrc in Gentoo References: <201007041630.07537.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> <20100704133949.0cda055a@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20100704133949.0cda055a@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1ad77d6a-0074-4c69-9f84-085e0f4e30c1 X-Archives-Hash: 2ab9777adf7661fbeedf86c827ccbf39 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 07/04/2010 02:39 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jul 2010 17:17:25 +0200 > Fabio Erculiani wrote: > >> How are we supposed to handle the amount of installations out there >> that are using OpenRC then? >> OpenRC/bl-2 have proven to be a big improvement over the old stuff. I >> am for fixing current bugs, and keep it maintenance mode at least. >> I'm already spread over several things but I could give a hand to >> other devs willing to take over. > > > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_21f716d5ffa6f04520e39d12fbe43452.xml > >> The only reason why OpenRC has not come up for stabilization by it's >> maintainers is the fact that everytime there's a new version readied >> for release, on the horizon there's new incompatible changes being >> planned for the next version. The OpenRC maintainers in Gentoo have >> always chosen to wait until OpenRC settles down a little bit. Now with >> the plan to drop support for certain features (ADSL and PPP support in >> the networking code), it's going to rewrite more Gentoo people to step >> up to develop and maintain this code. > > > I would say it's settled down now. > > I don't think stable can wait another 2-3 years on baselayout-1 while we > switch to yet another rc system. > > For those of you not on the #gentoo-dev channel, I just announced I am gonna be looking at the openrc code and fixing the bugs and working to continue the development. Anyone that is interested in helping please feel free to contact me off list to discuss how we will handle getting openrc back on track. - -- ====================================================== Jory A. Pratt anarchy -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Mozilla Lead GPG: 2C1D 6AF9 F35D 5122 0E8F 9123 C270 3B43 5674 6127 ====================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkww6okACgkQwnA7Q1Z0YSdhmQCgkKbxZtEX+xZ5EctZYMJ3gegR w30AnidMZVVlTY6OLJ2/vR8dr9wQ/lRD =F1WI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----