From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OU10A-0006Yi-IM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:23:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A5D2E0D49; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019B5E0D3D for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.226] (qob2.kyla.fi [82.130.46.226]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 366AC3247F for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:23:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C2B7DBD.5010508@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:24:13 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] debug USE flag misuse References: <1277910540.11106.99.camel@yamato> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7B910726FA69EBFA63DD73A4" X-Archives-Salt: dee14cf7-b8ec-4286-9dff-8aaaeb14d787 X-Archives-Hash: e66e0c62a6064ed226c99e008b63e82f This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7B910726FA69EBFA63DD73A4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/01/2010 02:25 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:09:00 +0200, "Diego E. 'Flameeyes'" Petten=C3=B2= > wrote: >=20 >> Please check the linked documentation or my blog post[1] on the matter= >> if you want to understand the reasoning. I'll be dropping the flag and= >> its context from now on if I stumble across it, without further >> warnings. >=20 > Hey Diego, (not sure if you are on -dev list or not, therefore adding > you to cc) >=20 > What is the consensus on if the metadata.xml specifies that it will add= > CFLAGS? Surely it is not as black/white as the global suggests..? >=20 > local:debug:app-portage/eix: Build with CXXFLAGS/LDFLAGS for debugging > support; not recommended for normal use. >=20 I think metadata.xml descriptions should only be used to be more detailed than the global meaning. One criteria for being a global use flag is that the flag means the same across packages. Regards, Petteri --------------enig7B910726FA69EBFA63DD73A4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJMK33EAAoJEPeUsk245Ozwr1wP/0O2MxiSWyGKGn3YQ9RTJ815 6dBRlbrETm0kkuGne90QEnCCtC7PSQahCrv4EhX63BNnB0R5sl82wU8yq8gV3lEp haXnL/VMdzlOSMWtObCk6k8zD2Z7UQlcMMOAjh/LUaykE9xuHJDXkqsK3PJ8aLmt cheUhYwZhPgWZL0hqyPZB4whkDSjmW/YURpCPVLpwFyieubqoJqOQGFS0h/zSe7G NvEnLvWjxw8ojlQbLCHSIJa7yW+y1jUGFZBeu8mk0bq1sjHofRWoDw1qu//NLuHt NkI3FKFHAKq8lx4Zn9XX0YUkVoJDDdUS/tYlxz+Q5LGsSWmqfjFCnf7qB+IGulyK /7MZJbSLn0zpAF4zqmNlogmFXIeOVMndtfPFLUd8oZHqUtBuMuRnc5XJNGggdWkG VLp348IUVgj9ft/X9/mlezjlGkAZFevwozNyVubsEu4+Na+iaRBqEIM12Z41FNzz XZ8X2XaYO9qyl+Hn7aRxYVwaHE4MeBcw+brTAgEVBuXFpKF+cxYnGF43eda4cmMu 8GrgYpiUFPAMDL0AIITZ0pi2l4grppeneTO1UP2813D+miVQ/Z8BLm8w4E9kgeMm ZRe6KYnMht568n7tkOnPkc7yzM56J+o4FjZihYfeA7AIM9UQugFpfiadpyGF8BOR XvdEUfhU6lU2xnsEFFhX =qAyq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7B910726FA69EBFA63DD73A4--