From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ORf2b-0004Ka-29 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:31:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36C13E0918; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:31:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A2DE081D for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:31:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (fi122.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.53.34.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 506401B408C for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C22ED9B.7040307@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 07:31:07 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] council manifesto for ferringb References: <20100624014241.GA7349@hrair> In-Reply-To: <20100624014241.GA7349@hrair> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig5077BE053CE5C0B77A97F15D" X-Archives-Salt: 98c336a5-c6fa-41b5-98d2-6119a233e1ff X-Archives-Hash: ad97bf6fe0b125eb6b89c4f8fcac4425 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5077BE053CE5C0B77A97F15D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/24/10 3:42 AM, Brian Harring wrote: > Simplest example, I want the git migration plan finished- since robin > was overloaded and no one was doing it, I chipped in the work I could > do (optimization of the conversion so it wasn't a full day outage). I respect your work on this, and really hope the git migration will go just great. However, I'm wondering why we're delaying the migration to minimize the outage instead of doing the migration earlier? I'd rather have git soon with longer, but acceptable outage, than in the future, with a very small outage. On the other hand, I'm not familiar with the technical side and possibly other reasons that may prevent us from "closing the tree" for a long period of time. Pawe=C5=82 --------------enig5077BE053CE5C0B77A97F15D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkwi7aAACgkQuUQtlDBCeQJJygCeKh/rbltmOeKStZwcFx+xN7XS pTsAn3vnlFjU1VFC8rkTLZpEnEFDIAI0 =BAOE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5077BE053CE5C0B77A97F15D--