From: Mike Auty <ikelos@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:33:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C20E5DD.7020400@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimDt5RFik_jZZ4nsJS_UvGn9wSSTpcl_a5-Q_1r@mail.gmail.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 22/06/10 15:33, Arun Raghavan wrote:
>> Why not just gintrospection?
>
> I still think "introspection" is easier to grok. It's unlikely that
> it's going to be used in a completely different sense by other
> packages in the future, so let's stick with "introspection" please.
Gintrospection gives more information (things starting with g are
generally gnome related, which this is), and grepping for introspection
will still turn it up. It also solves the concerns that all the people
on this thread have voiced about introspection being too generic. I
can't see why introspection is that much easier for people to "grok"?
Gintrospection seems like a good compromise that everyone can agree on...
Mike 5:)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkwg5d0ACgkQu7rWomwgFXqr+QCggMCbz0F9Jm/WxK080ZcVLLWV
+bcAnj4A72j+T9iLmbyW+0uFDCyYg23o
=vbNg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-22 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-20 14:42 [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: introspection Arun Raghavan
2010-06-20 19:37 ` [gentoo-dev] " Pacho Ramos
2010-06-20 21:35 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-20 21:53 ` Pacho Ramos
2010-06-20 20:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Olivier Crête
2010-06-20 21:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-20 22:55 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-20 23:33 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-21 4:43 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 7:10 ` Michał Górny
2010-06-21 4:44 ` [gentoo-dev] " Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 6:13 ` Alexis Ballier
2010-06-21 6:53 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-21 7:03 ` Alexis Ballier
2010-06-21 7:04 ` "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
2010-06-21 9:07 ` Duncan
2010-06-21 13:46 ` Olivier Crête
2010-06-21 14:49 ` Duncan
2010-06-21 13:55 ` René 'Necoro' Neumann
2010-06-21 7:33 ` [gentoo-dev] " Maciej Mrozowski
2010-06-21 14:22 ` Olivier Crête
2010-06-21 15:44 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-06-21 15:53 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 9:47 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 11:24 ` [gentoo-dev] " Peter Hjalmarsson
2010-06-22 14:33 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 16:33 ` Mike Auty [this message]
2010-06-22 17:11 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-22 20:17 ` Mike Auty
2010-06-23 4:03 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-06-25 14:56 ` Mart Raudsepp
2010-06-22 18:00 ` Jacob Godserv
2010-06-21 14:49 ` [gentoo-dev] " Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-06-22 17:14 ` [gentoo-dev] " Arun Raghavan
2010-07-23 13:14 ` Maciej Mrozowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C20E5DD.7020400@gentoo.org \
--to=ikelos@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox