From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OQhUq-00024a-5o for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:57:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A1F7E08F6; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.necoro.eu (necoro.eu [84.19.167.72]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A77E08ED for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (dslb-094-216-089-158.pools.arcor-ip.net [94.216.89.158]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.necoro.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F07771002B7 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:56:59 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C1F6F6B.5090201@necoro.eu> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 15:55:55 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UmVuw6kgJ05lY29ybycgTmV1bWFubg==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection References: <201006210913.29074.aballier@gentoo.org> <4C1F0EE3.5010208@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4C1F0EE3.5010208@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig80C4DE6BF435755F2C67CD1B" X-Archives-Salt: 18bb4f9b-ebe8-4fa4-b479-441a69c8ae7f X-Archives-Hash: db0063ed1522dc1ed2c12de1f67f513d This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig80C4DE6BF435755F2C67CD1B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 21.06.2010 09:04, schrieb "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr.": > I think that "introspection" is similarly too general. What about calling the useflag "GIR" (or "gir")? If the user does not know what it stands for, he will hopefully look up the description to see what it means. And in contrast to "introspection" the chance of getting a false sense of the meaning is low. Just as an idea (as I personally dislike awfully-long-useflag-names) - Ren=C3=A9 --------------enig80C4DE6BF435755F2C67CD1B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkwfb3AACgkQ4UOg/zhYFuANHwCfTuKl2OOM3B6+6itSq1PTbA5a rjUAnAx2j+JKpgYoJDHeOo/PkexCP9IL =C0ci -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig80C4DE6BF435755F2C67CD1B--