From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OQ0zj-00011U-UT for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:34:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E06DE08F5; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94E3E08CA for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:33:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179003172.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.3.172]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA721B4043 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:33:55 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C1CF170.9040101@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 18:33:52 +0200 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100419 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tone in Gentoo References: <4C184607.5080907@gentoo.org> <4C1C2A90.1020603@gentoo.org> <4C1C3768.1070008@gentoo.org> <20100619093720.GJ12490@hrair> In-Reply-To: <20100619093720.GJ12490@hrair> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 4bb6951e-c1b6-4b08-bb66-192fbdbbc314 X-Archives-Hash: 755eaab3857eee01c477da224c4542a2 Brian, On 06/19/10 11:37, Brian Harring wrote: > and you do not go into someone's home and tell them > what they can/cannot say. right. #gentoo-infra is not anybody's home though: it's an infra-matter channel of Gentoo. If you like to view it as anybody's home it's home of Gentoo and therefore my home, too. > If you cannot understand this simple fact, then you're going to have > many, many ackward social interactions with the rest of humanity. > > Why? Because you're going around telling other people how *you* want > them to act, instead of what is *communally* agreed to. It seems we're just about finding out what is commonly agreed to. You are absolutely right: if that tone we had in #gentoo-infra yesterday is more agreed to in Gentoo than a friendly, non-sexist interaction I might be wrong around here and asking for changes is pointless, correct. Best, Sebastian