From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-41392-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1OPzBk-0005c1-Py
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:38:33 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8313E0802;
	Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:38:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB326E0800
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:38:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179003172.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.3.172])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AAF71B4034
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:38:01 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4C1CD646.2070703@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2010 16:37:58 +0200
From: Sebastian Pipping <sping@gentoo.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100419 Thunderbird/3.0.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Tone in Gentoo
References: <4C184607.5080907@gentoo.org> <4C1C2A90.1020603@gentoo.org> <4C1C3768.1070008@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4C1C3768.1070008@gentoo.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: ac318228-d906-4510-a51d-200b952fba72
X-Archives-Hash: 05b99ad82ed0cb11144ab9d02abd2456

Jorge,


On 06/19/10 05:20, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> you're confusing talk and jokes between developers on a particular
> private room with tone between members of the global community in public
> mediums.

It wasn't #gentoo-roughshit, it was in #gentoo-infra - the place devs go
on infra matters.  To the outside of Gentoo it may be a private channel,
to Gentoo itself it is not (or should not be) a private channel.  I can
expect proper tone from an infra related channel just like from #gentoo-doc.


> You're also missing an important point that some channels have their own
> environment and so one should start by understanding it. Furthermore,
> pushing for change and or imposing one's view on an established channel
> is not a "nice" way to deal with the residents of that channel.
> Another thing you've just done and should be aware of, is that you chose
> to air into the public private conservations. When any Gentoo developer
> decides to reveal a private discussion in the core ml or some other
> private medium into the general public without the other parties
> knowledge and or consent, that developer is abusing the other members'
> "trust".

If #gentoo-infra bangs their moms the rest of the community deserves to
know.  I didn't mention names or anything implying specific participants
to the outside.


> You have shown to be very attached to this topic, so much so that you've
> just blown this completely out of proportion. There was no "foul play"
> intended in that conservation

I was more or less told to fuck off if I don't like the tone.
This is where I left the channel.

How will I be able to tell women on LinuxTag 2010 that we do want women
in Gentoo with such tone in #gentoo-infra?

Best,



Sebastian