From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPOdp-0007x0-CL for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:37:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37D2AE0D23; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173017pub.verizon.net (vms173017pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.17]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8FAE0CED for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:36:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.thefreemanclan.net ([unknown] [96.245.231.248]) by vms173017.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0L4600E7HMXGRB66@vms173017.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 18:36:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (rich.homedns.org [192.168.0.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gw.thefreemanclan.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B671759D25 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:36:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <4C1AB193.6090800@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:36:51 -0400 From: Richard Freeman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100421 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposing fundamental changes to DevRel References: <4C196595.20600@gentoo.org> <4C196D69.6070808@gentoo.org> In-reply-to: <4C196D69.6070808@gentoo.org> Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b60a0591-fe63-4e41-a19f-62c247604d90 X-Archives-Hash: e9a327b8a5ed39dea571999eab9787b3 On 06/16/2010 08:33 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On 17-06-2010 00:00, Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> 3) Let Gentoo developers vote on who's in the conflict resolution >> team just like we do with the council. > > AFAIK this never happened before and in my opinion choosing conflict > resolution members by "popularity" is a very bad idea. Well, as long as the council remains the board of appeals and it is elected, I don't have a problem. I'd also go a step further and say that devrel members serve at the pleasure of the council. Some might debate that. Rich