From: "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:37:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1AA3A9.2040204@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C1A9E38.8050206@gmail.com>
Dale schrieb:
>>>>> One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe reserves the right to
>>>>> download and install additional Content Protection software on the
>>>>> user's PC.
>>>> Not like anyone will actually *read* the license before adding it to
>>>> their accept group, but if they did this would indeed be an important
>>>> thing of which users should be aware.
>>> I defend it is our job to warn users about this kind of details. To me
>>> it sounds that a einfo at post-build phase would do the job, what do
>>> you
>>> guys think?
Though I am not opposed to adding a warning, I think the license mask is
sufficient. If users demonstrate their indifference by setting
ACCEPT_LICENSE="*" or adding AdobeFlash-10.1 without reading the
license, then I somehow doubt that elog messages will have an effect.
>> Definitely yes! This is a very dangerous snippet in Adobe's license
>> which
>> should be pretty clearly pointed at to every user.
>>
>
> Could that also include a alternative to adobe? If there is one.
There are three open-source flash browser plugins in portage:
- swfdec: development seems to have stalled
- gnash: I have received mixed reports about the stability of the
current version. The next release will include VA-API support and other
improvements.
- lightspark: a recent effort which is in its early stages and still
incomplete in many ways (eg. audio support is planned for 0.4.2)
None of them I consider good enough to replace adobe-flash for the
average user.
Regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-17 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 21:20 [gentoo-dev] Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
2010-06-16 12:40 ` Jim Ramsay
2010-06-16 12:45 ` Angelo Arrifano
2010-06-17 22:06 ` Lars Wendler
2010-06-17 22:14 ` Dale
2010-06-17 22:37 ` Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn [this message]
2010-06-17 23:20 ` Lars Wendler
2010-06-18 1:42 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-18 6:10 ` Dale
2010-06-18 9:08 ` Lars Wendler
2010-06-18 10:16 ` Alec Warner
2010-06-18 13:58 ` Angelo Arrifano
2010-06-18 17:56 ` Brian Harring
2010-06-19 2:29 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
2010-06-23 18:41 ` [gentoo-dev] " Domen Kožar
2010-06-24 5:59 ` Thilo Bangert
2010-06-19 2:25 ` [gentoo-dev] " Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C1AA3A9.2040204@gentoo.org \
--to=chithanh@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox