From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPNLw-0004Qw-1R for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:14:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C2EDE0D3B; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:14:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f199.google.com (mail-yw0-f199.google.com [209.85.211.199]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65791E0D34 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 22:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh37 with SMTP id 37so414175ywh.2 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:14:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t/WPQprwnyl8Men+eaKs/h165h/EZM+odCuB8iYQSkg=; b=AVdxlGpWLovCVyR339Io1AaVaxGi1eZYGZLP75lUt58tjU7ImHMmIq+3YNPy3xBqsg pFVgeANg7stQWnVn1XnxGUVnOa9g1LbeLmEHehpvqUd49rNWw1E+rsoxKhVBU/HpYorv zUaC09dR+OEUvA812D1MXTrVQDs8u2BORseTc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UzznUEUySp7Eor8h4azIpEqsQHk/Pt0cioXOpMbhZwlGOjzymGEDmPgK+CGRtrdd+J GCnmmJUmP2ENcHgGSi0QX/ZcsFxwyFdodV/mtjuzuZ322isGdWCSJ+yxYP+e6TKQr++7 YLRbLXa781Z27WDcLRu1/cf2IdiFuHyLxT+5E= Received: by 10.150.194.13 with SMTP id r13mr124962ybf.284.1276812858932; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-0-93-68.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.93.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm925407ybe.36.2010.06.17.15.14.16 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C1A9E38.8050206@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:14:16 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100616 Gentoo/2.0.4-r2 SeaMonkey/2.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group References: <4C169D32.5080706@gentoo.org> <20100616084022.2f3c84fe@vrm378-02.vrm378.am.mot.com> <4C18C761.5080909@gentoo.org> <201006180006.53669.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201006180006.53669.polynomial-c@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c4fa2d73-32ee-43e2-85c4-b4a0900c4172 X-Archives-Hash: a8932a3da7b9ed3deae0c41b1cd014c4 Lars Wendler wrote: > Am Mittwoch 16 Juni 2010, 14:45:21 schrieb Angelo Arrifano: > =20 >> On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote: >> =20 >>> Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote= : >>> =20 >>>> I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous >>>> AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, and could possibly >>>> also be added to that group. >>>> =20 >>> Agreed, on both points, and done. Thanks for finding and airing this >>> issue! >>> >>> =20 >>>> One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe reserves the right to >>>> download and install additional Content Protection software on the >>>> user's PC. >>>> =20 >>> Not like anyone will actually *read* the license before adding it to >>> their accept group, but if they did this would indeed be an important >>> thing of which users should be aware. >>> =20 >> I defend it is our job to warn users about this kind of details. To me >> it sounds that a einfo at post-build phase would do the job, what do y= ou >> guys think? >> =20 > Definitely yes! This is a very dangerous snippet in Adobe's license whi= ch > should be pretty clearly pointed at to every user. > > =20 Could that also include a alternative to adobe? If there is one. Dale :-) :-)