From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OPHO6-0008Sp-8u for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10A79E0930; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7D0E074F for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Petteri-Ratys-MacBook-Pro.local (nat-cawifiupf.upf.edu [193.145.39.152]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66DB62CB9C for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2010 15:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C1A44AF.2020703@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 17:52:15 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proposing fundamental changes to DevRel References: <4C196595.20600@gentoo.org> <4C1A3AF1.1080306@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4C1A3AF1.1080306@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8acea44b-c2bd-4620-8d42-3af6b4fb9849 X-Archives-Hash: 87fb2cf05337ba53938ba6faebae6b5c On 17.6.2010 17.10, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > Duncan, > > > On 06/17/10 09:56, Duncan wrote: >> DevRel is >> understaffed. I've seen observations to the effect that most developers >> aren't interested in getting involved in that area, particularly in >> reference to the conflict resolution subgroup > > when I offered to join DevRel last time in reply to a thread called > "Devrel needs new members" Petteri told me: > > "The amount of interest has surprised me so I'll first need > to talk with existing members to see how many makes sense to > train in at this point." > > I'm unsure if that refered to conflict resolution, recruiting or both. > Petteri? > We had interest in all areas of DevRel operations. I know I am a bottle neck at the moment. I didn't actively seek this position but accepted nomination when asked to. Currently my priority are the three GSoC projects I am the project owner for. If other (older) DevRel members feel like training new members they are free to do so. Regards, Petteri