From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OOrzw-0005hK-4U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:45:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2A31E0A86; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F96E0A43 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:45:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.2.10] (bl3-202-55.dsl.telepac.pt [213.13.202.55]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CD61B4185 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C18C761.5080909@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 14:45:21 +0200 From: Angelo Arrifano Organization: Gentoo Linux Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100419 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding AdobeFlash-10{,.1} licenses to EULA group References: <4C169D32.5080706@gentoo.org> <20100616084022.2f3c84fe@vrm378-02.vrm378.am.mot.com> In-Reply-To: <20100616084022.2f3c84fe@vrm378-02.vrm378.am.mot.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b664d406-13f2-4230-9218-39c62dbc3e31 X-Archives-Hash: f3b3971f14e8756a3544c66a33e21ab5 On 16-06-2010 14:40, Jim Ramsay wrote: > Ch=C3=AD-Thanh Christopher Nguy=E1=BB=85n wrote: >> I propose that this license be added to the EULA group. The previous=20 >> AdobeFlash-10 license is similar in this regard, and could possibly >> also be added to that group. >=20 > Agreed, on both points, and done. Thanks for finding and airing this > issue! >=20 >> One notable section is 7.6 in which Adobe reserves the right to >> download and install additional Content Protection software on the >> user's PC. >=20 > Not like anyone will actually *read* the license before adding it to > their accept group, but if they did this would indeed be an important > thing of which users should be aware. >=20 I defend it is our job to warn users about this kind of details. To me it sounds that a einfo at post-build phase would do the job, what do you guys think?