From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OKBQ5-0006ym-Vv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:29:18 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C9BEEE111C; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B446AE1051 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (aasx192.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.5.235.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A6F1B4010 for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2010 14:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4C07BC29.2090006@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:28:57 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: Notify people about empty herds (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] FTR: media-optical@g.o has no developers) References: <4C0785C0.3080700@gentoo.org> <1275570192.7629.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig60E0D92B4759AD647E84D1F8" X-Archives-Salt: 866eb0ea-2bdc-4ea4-80c7-a907fd0f29da X-Archives-Hash: 8114a6d27d506ab9531072f40393e996 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig60E0D92B4759AD647E84D1F8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/3/10 3:32 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > And maybe it would be a wise move to merge/remove some herds because ,a= s I > see, the number of herds is equal ( or even higher ) to the number of > developers. Here are some more empty herds: 1) kerberos herd is empty :( 2) secure-tunnelling is empty 3) utf8 is empty and looks like a candidate for removal As for other herds, I don't see anything obviously wrong. It seems fine and useful to have a generic alias even if there is only one developer in a herd. Pawe=C5=82 --------------enig60E0D92B4759AD647E84D1F8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkwHvC0ACgkQuUQtlDBCeQJ4/ACfWDkLDJk4WTqzaAmY5QKP6TJ6 DzkAn0ccPEUq9J6EfUte67A00fbj+7yV =wIar -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig60E0D92B4759AD647E84D1F8--