From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OCvLi-0005lF-KX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:54:46 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0FCD9E0872; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from earth.farbfinsternis.net (earth.farbfinsternis.net [87.118.98.117]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24EEDE085C for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 13:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (p4FD54816.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.72.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by earth.farbfinsternis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C0347C003D for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 15:56:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BED5613.4020603@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 15:54:27 +0200 From: Matti Bickel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100423 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use the VERIFIED status in bugzilla? References: <4BED4602.6040700@gentoo.org> <4BED517A.4090709@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BED517A.4090709@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 8f11b893-eb6a-4fea-ab5f-1ff58ef6934b X-Archives-Hash: 850d7c3c57fd4557d8f59ea24ed26775 On 05/14/2010 03:34 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I'd like to see the whole thing go away. It's this one user I've pretty > much ever seen using it. And he's using it to change "RESOLVED" status > to "VERIFIED" on e.g. removal bugs, stabilization bugs, keywording bugs= ... cleanup++ >> [1] - http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.4/en/html/lifecycle.html > Looks nice on paper if you put it like that, but not really how it's > working for us in reality. >From my work on b.g.o: I use a simplified version of this, shown at: http://dev.gentoo.org/~mabi/gentooBzLifecycle.png Basically three states less and a NEEDINFO resolution added. That's all I ever touched in the years.