From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1OCuHb-0008Ns-SA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:46:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 099E9E079C; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005FFE075B for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (bl9-38-85.dsl.telepac.pt [85.242.38.85]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378EA1B409C for ; Fri, 14 May 2010 12:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BED4602.6040700@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 14 May 2010 12:45:54 +0000 From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev Subject: [gentoo-dev] Does anyone use the VERIFIED status in bugzilla? X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ecfbf23f-a389-49f4-b92f-64788eb4ae5d X-Archives-Hash: ad836c6b56b56421ac475049b0b49038 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi. Following Petteri's thread last month about RESOLVED LATER and given a issue that has been reported to User Relations about the "ab"use of the VERIFIED status in Bugzilla, I'd like to get some feedback from fellow developers. We have a user that has been marking resolved bugs as verified following his actions on other bugzilla(s) and he quotes the Bugzilla Docs[1] to explain his actions. Some developers have become upset because of the "spam" email that action causes. It seems to me the reason those developers got upset is that they don't value the VERIFIED status so I wonder if anyone uses that status or if we should just drop it. If possible and useful, would we like to restrict the VERIFIED status change to a specific group of people? Please share your thoughts on this so we can decide how to act on this case. [1] - http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.4/en/html/lifecycle.html - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJL7UYCAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEP4nAQAMSTtiSk4lt54VQt9E0omuHR 5/AHuZUqFhUsCbK2Z9EV8140/J6AzGeixfpKRtCCp+kJoq8gNJFiR5I91xqcv530 E1au8JSiE43LFkjs98eDXlefnnxeNoS+gkmS1kp9g7rYw+eK/YyQe/CuU7dmE7vj vixAml20gIQS16tFPZGD9ypQfaCtMkQq1ktuHvZDf1+160TA+L99AglbZ9pQ1uSL 9nbWEYkXZd9Ez6n+fjaXU1m8lcq+t8DYJ3Op8qLxCglWek0lEpBI9Zc57fvve1p3 X+zXulf5EfZEtAam8geBanCj2Dm3AntJjzOo3clzcOYh9L5Hw/AeUxfRO93g0/+j dVHf5JLn6k6DHfxipkElW/uN52PBVgoTUmuIMfKflota2P46wvh4JLS+ISgEs8Tp UcwWuU3ZQu0T/rv5GUI0Tx1JFhOuqIhNcussyuePO8ZFLKGsDAjchBcEn3UCOOp3 TxdgUIc0pKeEgLHj9cXDWKsog3EoexNCrvDlMVYCb7UD0YcbzccVcRSU1M9vmjbQ PqRVq6EzsPJZSZ3Jh6ssa4BOG2AWjwbbyM5MqjN/kGgleGlK8vJk327s8PeEIQP3 FLCgg/VrjSA5y5YdWtr+EO3yxRCL6aG92GUuNGhcxZEw695MLGdPmBOVPj+1CJ/V ENB30Ib8swqlBTgKxq0e =bZ0I -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----