From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O6Knr-0004cm-4U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:35 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A67A0E081E; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED88BE07F4 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (aasm17.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.5.224.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB93D1B405A for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 09:40:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BD55F77.2090900@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:40:07 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] RFC: bugzilla flags for arch-testing X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8C2784516A4060CB358737B2" X-Archives-Salt: 53499568-ffbe-454e-8750-139102859a1d X-Archives-Hash: fde16c133fbce0857d29b2f0fe7a2899 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8C2784516A4060CB358737B2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To make it easier to find stabilization bugs with arch-testers' comments, I'd like to add new flags to Gentoo bugzilla. This is only an initial idea, and maybe a different implementation would be better (like the status whiteboard, if it's easily searchable). Initially, I'd like a new flag x86-at to be added, with states: " " (default), "+" (meaning that an AT has tested the package successfully on x86), "-" (meaning that an AT found some problems preventing stabilization) "?" (meaning a developer asks for more urgent AT testing) What do you think? Feel free to suggest alternative implementations. The goal is to easily find bugs where ATs posted comments that the package is ready to go stable. Also, I think it may be useful for other arch teams (like amd64). One solution would be to add yet another flag, like amd64-at, but maybe we can have some better ideas. After a consensus is reached, I'm going to file a bug for infra for necessary changes in bugzilla configuration. Pawe=C5=82 --------------enig8C2784516A4060CB358737B2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkvVX3wACgkQuUQtlDBCeQJPuQCdEwv483RZgAsUvpcTNEX93RTo G5MAn2FMmcOh/9gpJAqCKn1kvfHmggcC =ZuuK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8C2784516A4060CB358737B2--