From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O5yo8-0004I3-3z for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:11:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E93E8E0801; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09A8E07E0 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.197] (qiv5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E1667E50 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:11:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BD4153F.5000509@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:11:11 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits References: <4BD32D26.5090005@gentoo.org> <20100425040601.5dc8e5d7@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20100425040601.5dc8e5d7@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig57C0BA75A6443CD6CCD10266" X-Archives-Salt: c12330b5-c404-44f2-acc0-5db577a5f822 X-Archives-Hash: d0afde98ed8db2d686bf9833fdd59b68 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig57C0BA75A6443CD6CCD10266 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/25/2010 01:06 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300 > Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >=20 >> What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without >> mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff= >> in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent >> stuff too. >=20 > I think it's a good idea to strongly encourage it, but actually forcing= it > through cvs? No thanks. I'm not tracking down another dev just to fix= a > spelling mistake. :P >=20 >=20 How did the spelling mistake get there in the first place? A review system should reduce having them in the first place. Regards, Petteri --------------enig57C0BA75A6443CD6CCD10266 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJL1BVCAAoJEPeUsk245Ozw728P/0vKDD96Tji6f5eE+1b0xmsF I4Y5WQT4+G7hXYAeQw+0qRvLuBG+Ifft4xC6OrPxT8G9gvDOyZvlGScLUDgRrIb2 B3RjZ3CFVknq7jmhmlxX/P02yp9qh+D8vkwWZk133/FmdJL/w1q0S1OPGk03ZTgq SFLQKCI/LZegHJyYaTkHTYlm3R1I7t4X/qjIoU2dSVgb4Yx7eEyluCEwqi5/+ZfI zhuf7+C4nkmbZ9Zi7ls2WBF7hZ7UO11fGTAd5rF2bS2aLR1z1rM2i9KgKDILo2/b nR8Zx9EUF4Ho+9R90hefq83WXrOxdGtPIyW0ukNGtDsitq1b9JVk4p0hQr7pVTjG cA1RMoYPOHoLm9Ea/fnR6YC+wRhYjDohqFiv6pIudFepXIOI0uzuiDAm/edbbMqo ur/Oa1XSxq2yZdsY8+bmjqZ6MJM15iEd5fKXMLaj8K8NzWoZed/OMcjzpaiLxKf2 sBeVt2uT1sbpp983oA/jAt5C23YFHghP8HVycx0wIGagMLxNfElKDE9MaS6pOaX6 mL4AfZhfsjAe/d8wo1DKuYvY70LDm0fYrGZmua/IRCFj0gLWhj9duCNMqVI+BfpF QUG91e61IPIgyfhGJgVsiZGQ2UZe8jKxGDM6nCbFYz7IWRV1gjtNwDMvodbHJUdO PeMxdklopch6QC0Cf+Zm =O1FE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig57C0BA75A6443CD6CCD10266--