Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Requiring two sets of eyes for all eclass commits

["Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 704 bytes --]

On 04/25/2010 01:06 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:40:54 +0300
> Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 
>> What do you think about not allowing commits to eclasses without
>> mentioning an another developer who has reviewed and approved the diff
>> in the commit message? There's enough people on gentoo-dev for urgent
>> stuff too.
> 
> I think it's a good idea to strongly encourage it, but actually forcing it
> through cvs?  No thanks.  I'm not tracking down another dev just to fix a
> spelling mistake. :P
> 
> 

How did the spelling mistake get there in the first place? A review
system should reduce having them in the first place.

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]