From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O4Y6z-0000iU-3W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:28:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9120CE0AEA; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91687E0A6B for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (bl9-32-161.dsl.telepac.pt [85.242.32.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEA01B4040 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:28:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BCEE14D.7060601@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:28:13 +0000 From: "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100411 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists References: <4BCE6872.4040309@gentoo.org> <4BCE8646.5020309@doublecreations.com> In-Reply-To: <4BCE8646.5020309@doublecreations.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a66aa70f-2d6c-48be-9cf6-92137fd39cf7 X-Archives-Hash: 96a2842b8849f9b61009d85ddb33a67e -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21-04-2010 04:59, Vincent Launchbury wrote: > On 04/20/10 22:52, Jeremy Olexa wrote: >> Hello, >> As suggested in bug 291860, I am heading up an infra cleanup project to >> disable/close some mailing lists. Since the list is quite large, I want >> to send it out for RFC. > > Going by archives.gentoo.org stats, the following lists are also > inactive, and are all listed as 'Primary Gentoo Mailing Lists' at > www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml > > If there's a reason to keep any of them, perhaps they should be split > off to a 'Low-traffic Lists' section, as I can't see them being of much > use to most people. > gentoo-devrel > 2010 - 0 posts > 2009 - 1 post > 2008 - 2 posts > 2007 - 8 posts IIRC, this list was created to promote a way for developers to discuss Developer Relations policies. Even though this is likely to be most of the time a low traffic list, I think it still has merit - unless we chose to promote such discussions on a different "forum". - -- Regards, Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJLzuFNAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEPhxkP/3Ic49JbKonl7H3E3e7AEWvI oztqvZuKNBQQeI8PedSbLB1IZVLBEwtZDpBj+NdwCd7J497pTB2YK1j4lFs8OX0x W24gKwfmf22PffnETI13fiUbfxOrfxxnVIwOY5zWL5+A6bgf8J590Z1aRpGVX6vY 9khO7uDo7eN6YRFZyubrVOaadBJGnV5LJzga4IHai0zIn8vhgYs5hnF2j3SGjvRT MZ9Z+LFkvjh4hCFDGhX1r9p1b+G6Gudnxrhexomk4Nnl8zR1ZwBLKwf6UXVWXzMk gNRjk/wSyfuMOL+Sr0MRkoplTIqwF7k49PkWn6tM4AC3FCsliy00VFCBTEanFf7f aP7MUpS7psaoDWGuss+3GZZd1WdVH5ghGhknaMXFFl575xHKa2S47Evev26MWuQg viF1RZawpMSTiS5F+Z+rvGyBcJeUGVJJbhZTbotklH+Fecuknmn6SyJgH5raJSUP XjTFYgusW4MnMRHuoFcRWTy/lfAqXio1lzbt8iTBwo8ONhHIe6W1DOlYubGF4R3L 02zuenJJa8lDuKw/ty2zRQIuqKUw6sEAWpf8J6hHzgOTThYqfzi/Q0euAH3SaCfl jjjuUgnNz7JcZUxdYzJ3SKWL9mWqU8B5XLf4Pwq/CR7wK1d2Bc8BBaLOFtHAOTUI Pti7OpgQOamM4hxEGKed =LniS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----