From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O4S3H-0002m4-3G for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:00:43 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DF6FE0916; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.221.179]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF184E08FF for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 05:00:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk9 with SMTP id 9so8714888qyk.1 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.233.199 with SMTP id jz7mr6810794qcb.56.1271826007200; Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (CPE00027279f350-CM0016923fcb1e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.235.229.165]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm5239855qyk.7.2010.04.20.22.00.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BCE8646.5020309@doublecreations.com> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 00:59:50 -0400 From: Vincent Launchbury Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Disabling some of our Mail Lists References: <4BCE6872.4040309@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BCE6872.4040309@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: da68b8a0-eccf-470f-a661-6138128bbf06 X-Archives-Hash: 6def2d6a41db08007110c8beb9de9d50 On 04/20/10 22:52, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Hello, > As suggested in bug 291860, I am heading up an infra cleanup project to > disable/close some mailing lists. Since the list is quite large, I want > to send it out for RFC. Going by archives.gentoo.org stats, the following lists are also inactive, and are all listed as 'Primary Gentoo Mailing Lists' at www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml If there's a reason to keep any of them, perhaps they should be split off to a 'Low-traffic Lists' section, as I can't see them being of much use to most people. gentoo-ppc-dev 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 4 posts 2008 - 9 posts 2007 - 15 posts gentoo-hppa 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 0 posts 2008 - 1 post 2007 - 12 posts gentoo-desktop-research 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 0 posts 2008 - 3 posts 2007 - 12 posts gentoo-admin 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 8 posts 2008 - 3 posts 2007 - 3 posts gentoo-web-user 2010 - 4 posts 2009 - 0 posts 2008 - 10 posts 2007 - 10 posts gentoo-devrel 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 1 post 2008 - 2 posts 2007 - 8 posts gentoo-uk 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 0 posts 2008 - 16 posts 2007 - 6 posts gentoo-au 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 0 posts 2008 - 28 posts 2007 - 24 posts gentoo-vdr 2010 - 0 posts 2009 - 3 posts 2008 - 8 posts 2007 - 28 posts