From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O1l9B-00060b-Tw for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:47:42 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ECEEE08C5; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757A3E08A4 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (aatj32.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.5.247.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C6D1B4046 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BC4BC2F.7000101@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:47:11 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme References: <4BC22543.3020606@gentoo.org> <4BC22906.3070807@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BC22906.3070807@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig8C6D91C1BC1F6558C40C0908" X-Archives-Salt: ee133725-8f9f-4c68-8e28-553e1f1c92fa X-Archives-Hash: df7df46289564737e775511a646b54cc This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig8C6D91C1BC1F6558C40C0908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/11/10 9:54 PM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: > On 04/11/2010 10:38 PM, "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme? >> >> This would for example simplify the dependencies for >> www-client/chromium, which currently uses this: >> >=20 > What other packages would make use of the virtual? I think that the packages that currently depend on one icon theme, could instead just depend on that virtual. For example, xfce works fine without the xfce theme, provided some other theme (like gnome or tango) is there. Is it a requirement that more than one package should depend on it until we can extract a virtual? I think it would simplify managing the dependencies anyway. Another question is, would the freedesktop herd want to maintain the virtual? --------------enig8C6D91C1BC1F6558C40C0908 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkvEvDQACgkQuUQtlDBCeQLW/QCdFnWqbOQnH7kD1TTbY+FjcxM/ 1vgAnipFKPnVg4UICPMy6xJbd2miP+hA =Cmaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig8C6D91C1BC1F6558C40C0908--