From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O1j3S-0000nN-4p for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:33:38 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CA38E084F; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from earth.farbfinsternis.net (earth.farbfinsternis.net [87.118.98.117]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DA9E0837 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.23] (p4FD54581.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.213.69.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by earth.farbfinsternis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C30D7C003D for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:32:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BC49CD5.3090208@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:33:25 +0200 From: Matti Bickel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation References: <1271157930.11850.977.camel@tablet> <19396.28532.913516.120152@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <4BC497F0.9080606@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA672EC8CD0889B04E7102089" X-Archives-Salt: 7a3724d8-b455-4194-bb7e-1c9b1c9dce37 X-Archives-Hash: 384877494fa14bcf82ff028927c76ad2 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA672EC8CD0889B04E7102089 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alec Warner wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Matti Bickel wrote: >> Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: >>> From my PoV, editing ChangeLog is like editing history. Complete no-n= o. >> It is possible in all major SCMs for a reason. And I (as a user) would= >> laugh at Changelog entries saying "um, I got that bug number wrong, it= >> is really #1234". If I (as a developer) log such edits, I'm wasting my= >> users time. >=20 > Its not possible in perforce once your change has been submitted. Oh, missed that one. Maybe that makes perforce more "auditble" or whatnot= =2E I rather like the changelogs auto-generated. A method to link my git commit to bugzie would be awesome. I *do* envy debian and others for the auto bughandling they have. Previewing more than a raw number would also reduce (not eliminate) the errors committed, i guess. --------------enigA672EC8CD0889B04E7102089 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvEnNUACgkQfNMcoUhJ7GwPrgCfWSUoAqVmyTfkwyO/sva0pHTp NKkAnR7Nx+yfWLPO75Cq60SrQimKXnZr =jJ0Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA672EC8CD0889B04E7102089--