From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O13VQ-0004HN-5x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:11:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 607E7E07ED; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:11:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D91E06C5 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:11:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB7A818068 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:11:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (bdv75-1-81-57-102-74.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.102.74]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FB5818116 for ; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:11:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BC22C92.5000203@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:09:54 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=E9mi_Cardona?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy regarding the inactive members References: <201004111616.41414.hwoarang@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201004111616.41414.hwoarang@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 4fe89619-46dc-40d5-8ab3-39af7a86c780 X-Archives-Hash: 4a717242f98c0c29416c7501c3dc5cf4 Le 11/04/2010 15:16, Markos Chandras a =E9crit : > How about the participation to the discussions which took place every > day on our mailing lists or in IRC? I, for one, am actually glad that the council (as such) isn't involved in every troll fest we have on -dev, and I hope we keep it that way. > I guess not since we need to > explicitly bring each issue to the meeting so council can talk about it= . That's the whole point of the council (as I understand it): they only come in when there are issues that we (non-council devs) can't solve on our own. Why bother them with stuff that doesn't really concern them? Cheers, R=E9mi