[gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 536 bytes --]

What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?

This would for example simplify the dependencies for
www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:

|| (
    x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme
    x11-themes/tango-icon-theme
    x11-themes/xfce4-icon-theme
)

Also, possibly other icon theme packages in the tree could be added to that.

The suggested description would be "Virtual for desktop environments'
icon themes."

Suggested herd would be freedesktop.

What do you think?

Paweł Hajdan jr


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Petteri Räty]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 316 bytes --]

On 04/11/2010 10:38 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?
> 
> This would for example simplify the dependencies for
> www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:
> 

What other packages would make use of the virtual?

Regards,
Petteri


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 900 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Nirbheek Chauhan]

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 10:38 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?
>>
>> This would for example simplify the dependencies for
>> www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:
>>
>
> What other packages would make use of the virtual?
>

Theoretically, any package that currently depends on gnome-icon-theme
should be able to depend on that since all those themes follow the fdo
standard for icon naming.

-- 
~Nirbheek Chauhan

Gentoo GNOME+Mozilla Team

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 819 bytes --]

On 4/11/10 9:54 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 04/11/2010 10:38 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>> What do you think about creating a new virtual package, icon-theme?
>>
>> This would for example simplify the dependencies for
>> www-client/chromium, which currently uses this:
>>
> 
> What other packages would make use of the virtual?

I think that the packages that currently depend on one icon theme, could
instead just depend on that virtual. For example, xfce works fine
without the xfce theme, provided some other theme (like gnome or tango)
is there.

Is it a requirement that more than one package should depend on it until
we can extract a virtual? I think it would simplify managing the
dependencies anyway.

Another question is, would the freedesktop herd want to maintain the
virtual?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 195 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Denis Dupeyron]

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr."
<phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> I think that the packages that currently depend on one icon theme, could
> instead just depend on that virtual. For example, xfce works fine
> without the xfce theme, provided some other theme (like gnome or tango)
> is there.
>
> Is it a requirement that more than one package should depend on it until
> we can extract a virtual? I think it would simplify managing the
> dependencies anyway.

This is very similar to when you want to add a global USE flag. In
that case we usually require 5 packages and a general non-specific
purpose. It can easily be translated to the present situation.

More practically I would say: use your brain. If you think it makes
sense then go for it.

Denis.

[gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Markos Chandras]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hello fellow developers,

I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
pcmanfm, and possible other applications too, require an icon-theme to
be present, no matter which one. So I think it would make sense to
create a new virtual package to include all the existing icon-themes.

++: Avoid ugly dependencies like || ( x11-themes/foo-icon-theme
x11-themes/bar-icon-theme ... )

- --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up with
missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes should
include all the basic icons.

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376309

Thoughts?

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOOD/0AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCF84P/jlZqs2+KLszt7aHq43pGa56
AddR+cBI0qBxrB5/eNSI71Mkn3+WPIyqEzZTfo6BUIm3GsC9u1kx7tNQM5wgri41
YDZVZlUjD533slR6lOI6/INE6bQZ6y7bfl3pDLh9SMk2qKxMkww21+joeKZdgzqX
iq3TNOXtbwlL1DlpBYYMWuCLctw82+HQcx6h5ISDqBPoh6RHiOa8pjWgDaFEzzsR
ZCWwDjteSFEkKZOcvFONkcrq7Ntu2K5o+tBSAXQ2wT9bPuV9TPRYhNbmVoOodrMz
VYF7i2g4cYBmdikqsDZ2V6Amgt5dbyYSk8q9Fi2jYxQAj3CMGKFUZlsnJL+opluO
f6qj/7b2Z44vDulRWZHCzqy07JV3fnyP23LQi8QKGyKCmvbNAE3+jFSr+eyiaCgF
QSzn9oCyj7RkuUVJ/n15L7NRbCtx+sBFUBJ8oy19jK/pz1T3ac8c2FiovyhsW3Ml
Z5Q5zmmWTIQaCkIn8jUPBQ5sQRh9BNJNLOjTkBEKWxgM0GHMYJUadWJ3zCoxlUXh
pQ8arnTSU1Ascfd7otmJZVh6SPQNBCXmwWrKldssEW9oV/l+am6Js2DERsEC6fPq
RZISLt1wgmqpAdtKlYytgc+cBcHhfh8e+IWV6tgw0oEICwQEW5d7z7kDwxddv8oK
ZMLCxEH/TKvV90nMxxeG
=GIKP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn]

Markos Chandras schrieb:
> - --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up with
> missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes should
> include all the basic icons.

You could have USE flags for the virtual, so that some package could 
depend on virtual/icon-theme[foo-icons], while the virtual depends on 
foo-icons? ( || ( list of packages known to contain foo-icons ) )

Of course, this makes sense only if it is known or easy to find out 
which icon-themes contain which icons.


Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Alex Alexander]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:20, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello fellow developers,
>
> I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
> for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
> pcmanfm, and possible other applications too, require an icon-theme to
> be present, no matter which one. So I think it would make sense to
> create a new virtual package to include all the existing icon-themes.
>
> ++: Avoid ugly dependencies like || ( x11-themes/foo-icon-theme
> x11-themes/bar-icon-theme ... )
>
> - --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up with
> missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes should
> include all the basic icons.
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376309
>
> Thoughts?

I like the idea, anything that makes things work out of the box
without sacrificing options is welcome :)

> - --
> Regards,
> Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOOD/0AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCF84P/jlZqs2+KLszt7aHq43pGa56
> AddR+cBI0qBxrB5/eNSI71Mkn3+WPIyqEzZTfo6BUIm3GsC9u1kx7tNQM5wgri41
> YDZVZlUjD533slR6lOI6/INE6bQZ6y7bfl3pDLh9SMk2qKxMkww21+joeKZdgzqX
> iq3TNOXtbwlL1DlpBYYMWuCLctw82+HQcx6h5ISDqBPoh6RHiOa8pjWgDaFEzzsR
> ZCWwDjteSFEkKZOcvFONkcrq7Ntu2K5o+tBSAXQ2wT9bPuV9TPRYhNbmVoOodrMz
> VYF7i2g4cYBmdikqsDZ2V6Amgt5dbyYSk8q9Fi2jYxQAj3CMGKFUZlsnJL+opluO
> f6qj/7b2Z44vDulRWZHCzqy07JV3fnyP23LQi8QKGyKCmvbNAE3+jFSr+eyiaCgF
> QSzn9oCyj7RkuUVJ/n15L7NRbCtx+sBFUBJ8oy19jK/pz1T3ac8c2FiovyhsW3Ml
> Z5Q5zmmWTIQaCkIn8jUPBQ5sQRh9BNJNLOjTkBEKWxgM0GHMYJUadWJ3zCoxlUXh
> pQ8arnTSU1Ascfd7otmJZVh6SPQNBCXmwWrKldssEW9oV/l+am6Js2DERsEC6fPq
> RZISLt1wgmqpAdtKlYytgc+cBcHhfh8e+IWV6tgw0oEICwQEW5d7z7kDwxddv8oK
> ZMLCxEH/TKvV90nMxxeG
> =GIKP
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



-- 
Alex Alexander | wired
+ Gentoo Linux Developer
++ www.linuxized.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Samuli Suominen]

On 08/02/2011 09:20 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hello fellow developers,
>
> I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
> for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
> pcmanfm, and possible other applications too, require an icon-theme to
> be present, no matter which one. So I think it would make sense to
> create a new virtual package to include all the existing icon-themes.
>
> ++: Avoid ugly dependencies like || ( x11-themes/foo-icon-theme
> x11-themes/bar-icon-theme ... )
>
> --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up with
> missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes should
> include all the basic icons.
>
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376309
>
> Thoughts?
>

since whatever gets added to the virtual should be at least almost up to
date with the spec, and provide the most common icons

virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme for name, just my opinion...
http://standards.freedesktop.org/ as HOMEPAGE
freedesktop-bugs@gentoo.org as maintainer

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Markos Chandras]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/02/2011 07:30 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Markos Chandras schrieb:
>> - --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up with
>> missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes should
>> include all the basic icons.
> 
> You could have USE flags for the virtual, so that some package could
> depend on virtual/icon-theme[foo-icons], while the virtual depends on
> foo-icons? ( || ( list of packages known to contain foo-icons ) )
> 
> Of course, this makes sense only if it is known or easy to find out
> which icon-themes contain which icons.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> 
> 
Don't you think that this is a bit overkill? Do you think that having
IUSE="ipod k3b quassel skype" is better than having no use flags at all?
I personally dislike the idea since most icon themes ( oxygen, gnome,
lxde, faenza, xfce(?) ) provide pretty much the same icons.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=vkLs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 692 bytes --]

On 8/2/11 11:20 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
> for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
> pcmanfm, and possible other applications too, require an icon-theme to
> be present, no matter which one. So I think it would make sense to
> create a new virtual package to include all the existing icon-themes.

www-client/chromium isn't going to take this train. I was thinking about
something similar a few months ago but it turned out to be more complex
(the icon set used depends on the running desktop environment).

Anyway, if it's useful for other packages sounds good to me.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Alex Alexander]

On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 21:48, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 8/2/11 11:20 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
>> for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
>> pcmanfm, and possible other applications too, require an icon-theme to
>> be present, no matter which one. So I think it would make sense to
>> create a new virtual package to include all the existing icon-themes.
>
> www-client/chromium isn't going to take this train. I was thinking about
> something similar a few months ago but it turned out to be more complex
> (the icon set used depends on the running desktop environment).
>
> Anyway, if it's useful for other packages sounds good to me.

When running a DE you usually have an icon set lying around, the
problem usually shows up when you run a simple WM with random apps on
top.

-- 
Alex Alexander | wired
+ Gentoo Linux Developer
++ www.linuxized.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Markos Chandras]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/02/2011 07:30 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> Markos Chandras schrieb:
>> - --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up
>> with missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes
>> should include all the basic icons.
> 
> You could have USE flags for the virtual, so that some package could 
> depend on virtual/icon-theme[foo-icons], while the virtual depends
> on foo-icons? ( || ( list of packages known to contain foo-icons ) )
> 
> Of course, this makes sense only if it is known or easy to find out 
> which icon-themes contain which icons.
> 
> 
> Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> 
> 
I plan to go ahead with my proposal. I wont use any use flags for now.
Whoever feels this virtual is useful for him, he can use it, otherwise
you may skip it. I will send the virtual ebuild for review before I
commit it to portage tree.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
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=DD2m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Markos Chandras]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2154 bytes --]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/06/2011 12:00 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 07:30 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> Markos Chandras schrieb:
>>> - --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end
>>> up with missing icons for some applications. However, most icon
>>> themes should include all the basic icons.
> 
>> You could have USE flags for the virtual, so that some package
>> could depend on virtual/icon-theme[foo-icons], while the virtual
>> depends on foo-icons? ( || ( list of packages known to contain
>> foo-icons ) )
> 
>> Of course, this makes sense only if it is known or easy to find out
>>  which icon-themes contain which icons.
> 
> 
>> Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
> 
> 
> I plan to go ahead with my proposal. I wont use any use flags for
> now. Whoever feels this virtual is useful for him, he can use it,
> otherwise you may skip it. I will send the virtual ebuild for review
> before I commit it to portage tree.
> 

Please review the attached ebuild. If you think that more icon-themes
need to be added let me know. Unfortunately these are the icon themes
that I was able to test so far.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
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=8Z/B
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[-- Attachment #2: icon-theme-0.ebuild --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 510 bytes --]

# Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header: $

EAPI=4

DESCRIPTION="A virtual to choose between different icon themes"
HOMEPAGE="http://standards.freedesktop.org/"
SRC_URI=""

LICENSE=""
SLOT="0"
KEYWORDS="~alpha ~amd64 ~arm ~hppa ~ia64 ~mips ~ppc ~ppc64 ~sh ~sparc ~x86"
IUSE=""

RDEPEND="|| ( x11-themes/tango-icon-theme
	x11-themes/gnome-icon-theme
	kde-base/oxygen-icons
	lxde-base/lxde-icon-theme
	x11-themes/faenza-icon/theme )"

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

["Paweł Hajdan, Jr."]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 165 bytes --]

On 8/8/11 2:52 AM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> 	x11-themes/faenza-icon/theme )"

nit: This is a typo, right? I guess repoman would still catch it, but
anyway.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 194 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Maciej Mrozowski]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1595 bytes --]

On Tuesday 02 of August 2011 20:32:32 Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 08/02/2011 09:20 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> > Hello fellow developers,
> > 
> > I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual package
> > for all the icon-theme packages. According to this bug[1], it seems like
> > pcmanfm, and possible other applications too, require an icon-theme to
> > be present, no matter which one. So I think it would make sense to
> > create a new virtual package to include all the existing icon-themes.
> > 
> > ++: Avoid ugly dependencies like || ( x11-themes/foo-icon-theme
> > x11-themes/bar-icon-theme ... )
> > 
> > --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up with
> > missing icons for some applications. However, most icon themes should
> > include all the basic icons.
> > 
> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376309
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> since whatever gets added to the virtual should be at least almost up to
> date with the spec, and provide the most common icons
> 
> virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme for name, just my opinion...
> http://standards.freedesktop.org/ as HOMEPAGE
> freedesktop-bugs@gentoo.org as maintainer

++

virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme is a better name IMHO as it's what this virtual 
icon theme actually is - theme compliant with freedesktop standard (so that 
can be used by applications claiming support like chromium, KDE, Gtk apps), 
not just some icon theme (as any instant messenger icon set would fall under 
"some icon theme" category for instance).

-- 
regards
MM

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: virtual/icon-theme

[Markos Chandras]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 08/08/2011 05:58 μμ, Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 of August 2011 20:32:32 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>> On 08/02/2011 09:20 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>> Hello fellow developers,
>>> 
>>> I would like to discuss the possibility to create a new virtual
>>> package for all the icon-theme packages. According to this
>>> bug[1], it seems like pcmanfm, and possible other applications
>>> too, require an icon-theme to be present, no matter which one. So
>>> I think it would make sense to create a new virtual package to
>>> include all the existing icon-themes.
>>> 
>>> ++: Avoid ugly dependencies like || ( x11-themes/foo-icon-theme 
>>> x11-themes/bar-icon-theme ... )
>>> 
>>> --: Not all packages include the same icons so users may end up
>>> with missing icons for some applications. However, most icon
>>> themes should include all the basic icons.
>>> 
>>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=376309
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> since whatever gets added to the virtual should be at least almost
>> up to date with the spec, and provide the most common icons
>> 
>> virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme for name, just my opinion... 
>> http://standards.freedesktop.org/ as HOMEPAGE 
>> freedesktop-bugs@gentoo.org as maintainer
> 
> ++
> 
> virtual/freedesktop-icon-theme is a better name IMHO as it's what
> this virtual icon theme actually is - theme compliant with
> freedesktop standard (so that can be used by applications claiming
> support like chromium, KDE, Gtk apps), not just some icon theme (as
> any instant messenger icon set would fall under "some icon theme"
> category for instance).
> 
Yes I will fix the name and the typo that was mentioned in another
reply. I will commit the virtual tonight.

- -- 
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=lLna
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----