From: George Prowse <george.prowse@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:48:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BBF686E.7040807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100409172456.GA13726@Caemlyn.Fullrate>
On 09/04/2010 18:24, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 06:02:40PM +0100, George Prowse wrote:
>> On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
>>> On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine<guy.fontaine@videotron.qc.ca> wrote:
>>>> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
>>>>
>>>> My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project is just but another occasion for debating rules and politics. Reading some messages from some people I feel like I'm not welcome because I'm not a member of a group of selected people.
>>>
>>> Don't be dismayed by negative remarks, or a few naysayers who are not
>>> even part of the Gentoo Wiki Project. Any user (or dev) with
>>> constructive input is welcome. And as you volunteered, you are part of
>>> the project.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>
>> I still dont understand people's problems with this. Several devs have
>> said they've wanted one for years, it would be a great place to review
>> documentation before going in the official documentation, it's a great
>> place to discuss and collaborate on future dev handbook pages.
>>
>> The official wiki could and *should* work together with the unofficial
>> wiki because they complement eachother. The unofficial wiki isn't going
>> to want detailed OpenRC documentation and the official wiki isn't going
>> to want "how to set up FreeDOOM" on it.
>>
>
> Really? I understood it as the wiki being an all-purposes wiki, meaning users could (would and should) create articles on how to get some application running or how to get some setting working, and the developers will have their own "section", so to speak, where they can collaborate on various projects where a wiki would be an asset.
> It seems to me from the discussion here on the list that it is to centralize documentation (- the official docs), so that gentoo can point to the wiki and say "If it's not in our docs, maybe it's in the wiki".
>
> I may have mistaken the actual purpose of the wiki, but then by all means, correct me :-)
>
I see it as a collaboration piece, something to bridge the gap between
developers and users. Users can create pages detailing certain facets of
Gentoo and it may get to be included in the documentation on gentoo.org.
Some documentation is unfit for an official wiki but that doesn't mean
that the information doesn't need to be there for users, that is where
the official and unofficial wiki should work together .
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-09 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-05 18:12 [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project Ben de Groot
2010-04-05 18:52 ` Nathan Zachary
2010-04-05 19:00 ` Alex Legler
2010-04-05 19:15 ` Markos Chandras
2010-04-05 21:37 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-05 19:45 ` Sylvain Alain
2010-04-06 2:27 ` Ravi Pinjala
2010-04-06 5:16 ` Stuart Longland
2010-04-06 13:00 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-06 15:12 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-08 19:51 ` [gentoo-dev] " Ryan Hill
2010-04-08 20:13 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-08 20:56 ` Ryan Hill
2010-04-08 21:37 ` Sylvain Alain
2010-04-08 22:55 ` Ryan Hill
2010-04-09 0:38 ` Sylvain Alain
2010-04-09 11:26 ` Guy Fontaine
2010-04-09 12:35 ` Maciej Mrozowski
2010-04-09 13:02 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-09 13:19 ` Nirbheek Chauhan
2010-04-09 12:38 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-09 17:02 ` George Prowse
2010-04-09 17:24 ` Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
2010-04-09 17:32 ` AllenJB
2010-04-09 17:52 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-09 18:52 ` Mike Pagano
2010-04-09 17:48 ` George Prowse [this message]
2010-04-09 2:42 ` Patrick Nagel
2010-04-09 6:34 ` Duncan
2010-04-12 10:28 ` Roy Bamford
2010-04-12 11:32 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-12 13:13 ` George Prowse
2010-04-12 13:17 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-04-12 13:19 ` George Prowse
2010-04-12 13:22 ` Arun Raghavan
2010-04-12 13:41 ` George Prowse
2010-04-12 14:01 ` Ben de Groot
2010-04-12 16:47 ` Dale
2010-04-12 18:10 ` Duncan
2010-04-12 17:59 ` Duncan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BBF686E.7040807@gmail.com \
--to=george.prowse@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox