From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-40661-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1O0Hbf-0005p7-Jv
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 17:02:59 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3277CE080C;
Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13131E08F9
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 17:02:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so185522fgg.10
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=VQHuYin29XN7rPpJ9EAmSvHH9eXcOelEjzboT5psgSk=;
b=XzHWu9kBQ4bx25BwIyYaz5rvNxpikpDnIVp+KwtU6crDAb5EpjeuFRfrjWkFZCSCCd
OZW4Ox7G+qo5MQn31wY3cOn7G6dBiYjNzNvIUerzIdpB1dofAzAjOJ6JVLlXX0y7KTXW
0l414h1bK0OBbm7guqv2uFoWb9+hk5gX0IUzE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=V4vMhMjmETC846Gu69efsV27NEAeidIawa1LnINkljUdXteIG4C9VSBk/RCuaw6i0Z
Su01nuJOqofoNg4m7J+PqqSgfBGXbMX1fZRdM1EHUwhtoWy3lwkRaDS/jiEL58Ymgj1/
be7Dq8ybA4saLIZAm62CZKTX+uDeJWBloAYJw=
Received: by 10.87.68.26 with SMTP id v26mr768796fgk.40.1270832557489;
Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:02:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([95.147.53.129])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 15sm856799fxm.15.2010.04.09.10.02.36
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Fri, 09 Apr 2010 10:02:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4BBF5DB0.2040906@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:02:40 +0100
From: George Prowse <george.prowse@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project
References: <g2xe117dbb91004051112y6edf96cv937801b45d8ffb75@mail.gmail.com> <20100408135105.49ca2e21@gentoo.org> <y2ye117dbb91004081313j571417e0y139fced13d549fd9@mail.gmail.com> <20100408145604.647ce147@gentoo.org> <SNT117-W23520413AAE8221EE90FAD6160@phx.gbl> <20100408165536.76cdfcc9@gentoo.org> <SNT117-W36D5505A7FEC00DCCDD35AD6150@phx.gbl> <20100409072616.c8e29fbe.guy.fontaine@videotron.qc.ca> <r2ze117dbb91004090538vdf5ca6cbg432c18b9ceb7165@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <r2ze117dbb91004090538vdf5ca6cbg432c18b9ceb7165@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: a6a956b0-2da4-44ee-9e4a-bda70cf8d4a6
X-Archives-Hash: 125cff09f9b8f07485dc0269a32be0ac
On 09/04/2010 13:38, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 9 April 2010 13:26, Guy Fontaine<guy.fontaine@videotron.qc.ca> wrote:
>> There are things I know about Gentoo Linux and I'm pleased to share my knowledge with others as well as I'm glad to learn from others. I'm not a Gentoo dev and I neither have plan nor wish to be.
>>
>> My feeling is that Gentoo Wiki Project is just but another occasion for debating rules and politics. Reading some messages from some people I feel like I'm not welcome because I'm not a member of a group of selected people.
>
> Don't be dismayed by negative remarks, or a few naysayers who are not
> even part of the Gentoo Wiki Project. Any user (or dev) with
> constructive input is welcome. And as you volunteered, you are part of
> the project.
>
> Cheers,
I still dont understand people's problems with this. Several devs have
said they've wanted one for years, it would be a great place to review
documentation before going in the official documentation, it's a great
place to discuss and collaborate on future dev handbook pages.
The official wiki could and *should* work together with the unofficial
wiki because they complement eachother. The unofficial wiki isn't going
to want detailed OpenRC documentation and the official wiki isn't going
to want "how to set up FreeDOOM" on it.