From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NzS9P-0003Be-Bu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:06:23 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EAD7EE0BD8; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:06:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1E1E09AF for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:06:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] (bl4-84-52.dsl.telepac.pt [81.193.84.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666951B4031 for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2010 10:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BBC5906.4080405@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 12:05:58 +0200 From: Angelo Arrifano Organization: Gentoo Linux Foundation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [git migration] The problem of ChangeLog generation References: <4BBB31D0.3080702@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: cdbcc9a2-5ca8-4cb4-9721-95c954dc5c1c X-Archives-Hash: 52f1eadc551dfc94ce8cde86309462a2 On 07-04-2010 00:21, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:06:24AM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: >> Why not just get rid of the in-tree Changelogs entirely? The scm >> logs already document this information, so why have it in a file? > The major concern with this is users that are NOT connected to the > internet always. > If you are connected, you can just use --exclude Changelog in your rsync > options. > That's a good point. But can't we generate the ChangeLogs automatically from git on the main rsync server?