From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nz1eh-0003xO-AI for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 06 Apr 2010 05:48:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C4E2E0839; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D196E0826 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 05:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9872A81809A for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:48:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (bdv75-1-81-57-102-74.fbx.proxad.net [81.57.102.74]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16198180E0 for ; Tue, 6 Apr 2010 07:48:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BBACAE5.8020400@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2010 07:47:17 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UsOpbWkgQ2FyZG9uYQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? References: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: c7675134-77fb-4005-9fd3-521970b6e4e7 X-Archives-Hash: b40cbb528d5fcac88fdb3ee6dcb01de8 Le 03/04/2010 11:50, Petteri R=C3=A4ty a =C3=A9crit : > I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just > means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a > different resolution should be used. So what do you think about > disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: >=20 > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113121#c21 >=20 > Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says= : > "We will not hide problems" You're basically blaming LATER and other resolutions for users failing to *search* correctly. How about changing how users search instead? Let's make the small search box search for ALL bugs instead of just opened ones. *That* should help tremendously. That, and what Mart suggested. That's a good idea too. Cheers, R=C3=A9mi