From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyMFk-0002wH-Bs for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 04 Apr 2010 09:36:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ED0FE0B2D; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6C8E0919 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.197] (qiv5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E219C1B4033 for ; Sun, 4 Apr 2010 09:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB85D96.7040405@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 12:36:22 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? References: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> <1270330558.15538.4.camel@keitaro.perronet.esiee.net> <4BB85674.3070906@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig61BFB10B3FC9880D01817697" X-Archives-Salt: afd61735-fefc-4664-9744-69b9becfad10 X-Archives-Hash: 0ab74b8908be5ed66e02a060d117c06a This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig61BFB10B3FC9880D01817697 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/04/2010 12:16 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Petteri R=C3=A4ty wrote: >> On 04/04/2010 12:35 AM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: >>> You are trying to remove a valid status for a case that has been badl= y >>> managed ??? Speaking for gnome herd, afaik, all bugs marked LATER are= >>> for the simple reason they will be done later and no other status wou= ld >>> be fine expect REJECTED maybe, but we don't want to say that to the f= ace >>> of the reported like this do we ? >>> >> >> And why not just keep them open as suggested? >> >=20 > Because often there is no reason whatsoever to keep it open. People > want a package to be bumped that we *know* has been released, is in > the overlay (or will end up there soon), and will go into the tree > with GNOME 2.30. I see no reason whatsoever to keep it open. If we > start doing that, we'll end up with tons of extra bugs on our hands. >=20 There is a valid need for having a new version in tree that users will be searching for in bugzilla. If you want to hide these bugs from your normal listings then the tools for that have been provided in this thread= =2E Regards, Petteri > We already have pages that have the status of bumped packages,[1] so > we know what needs to be done. >=20 You might but not everyone searching for GNOME bugs in bugzilla knows how things are handled. Regards, Petteri --------------enig61BFB10B3FC9880D01817697 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLuF2dAAoJEPeUsk245Ozw4YkP/AhDg47GAI4zvUPwB5OktRAu E8vxIh3ZmaF1JHtjchl3/l29aSVSgji+no1MtgCzepw3xgMDF1sMOMlo4ExyqtJI Kb5IiqlLW8gPr5clnqbEp7W4F+/yBpvHr8C9O0CBMqXEHc70whwriQ8v3+2jX19U HCPYLCs8CDMxlVygsetIDtU4eO9B8MHUT+Q/chH2Nbss4v5+Vx9MyxK8/MtZfK+F Ngn7EKPODPSQklfSjwVHGe1PCPSMco4FC+EUvpxqMpeGTdMpg8MoIrrvtniguEbI faq2l2zOkQmGUgP3Sjseul8PEyJVPwC0lt0fyEz4f+h4w8MZ+JN4h1z0kBM7JKoU htgtuDnEf/sof8u4fY/XcOdgEH0Bi95ScpXuBJJmJ2TttsErUbs9/ApjcEEJFE6H 03Wllm30z919OrW7+f3LbnBmMfrxom4gx+8scMchJFK6CeJSXqu9IUQDxa0pH2UN uaYf6PcOa+ZpVUKCQfFNkXRuP7ie6uP5wE6Hg8K0HIwAWj2vC/1pP/iT5BU82xPD 5oSOFNN0Ma4wPehsv0Hd1pJYLrQo6PwE00iW1BtbPixBv0+D6+XIhl7SHkPCTCK8 nHTHa/igvyzwvXHC3M8ZxXSEurzpOD4iUDvdtPwGvleA5P+30rd8O0Mz+UHOlI1p SbOPl6ZukkCrJU+HVyX9 =IRy6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig61BFB10B3FC9880D01817697--