From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NyCyJ-0001hJ-22 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 23:41:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66CF4E0A7E; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997C5E0A04 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179029101.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.29.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D571B4036 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 23:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB7D232.1080905@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:41:38 +0200 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100331 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Gentoo Phoenix] an official Gentoo wiki References: <1270303944.18734.34.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 7d61844b-33f9-44e1-b3f5-9a6ef41a46d2 X-Archives-Hash: cfc8fe100bcd9ab4430243bbd5fa4ebe On 04/03/10 16:36, Ben de Groot wrote: > This also raises the question of license. Our current documentation > mostly uses the CC-BY-SA license, while the unoffical wiki adds a > non-commercial restriction. By choosing one license over the other > we will make copy-pasting content from the source that has the other > license, as far as I can see, illegal. I would say that interchange > possibilities with our existing official documentation has priority. Good point. I agree that a restriction against commercial usage does not work for us. Sebastian