From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ny1eT-0008IY-1U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:36:33 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BF05E0BE9; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:36:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99929E0BA2 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.22] (p4FDF2E8A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.223.46.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F371B4002 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 11:36:27 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB72836.4070006@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 13:36:22 +0200 From: Thomas Sachau Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: hardened-sources development (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is Gentoo dying?) References: <1270286192.18734.3.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> <4BB709A9.2000103@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB709A9.2000103@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=211CA2D4 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig108ACE699C77AD3C37F90324" X-Archives-Salt: 6b722536-3f7c-42d9-9449-3776a4ed8fee X-Archives-Hash: deab78e7cefd89ef7aeda7604194d3a9 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig108ACE699C77AD3C37F90324 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 03.04.2010 11:26, schrieb "Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan, Jr.": > On 4/3/10 11:16 AM, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: >> Hell no, but ... >> >> We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way.= >> Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas we= re >> users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead. >> >> For example: >> - hardened-sources are nowadays only available in an experimental >> overlay, lots of users keep asking what's happening to the >> hardened-sources on both the -dev but also the -hardened mailinglist. >=20 > I recently sent an e-mail to gentoo-dev, > >=20 > It seems that some work is being done, but there are people who > volunteered to help, like me. What needs to be done with hardened-sourc= es? >=20 > Just a note: I'm using it on my servers, so I'm really interested in > them being maintained, and I'm also able to test. >=20 Most development of hardened-sources was done in hardened-development ove= rlay. There are currently recent versions of hardened-sources, but they have some regressions, whic= h should be fixed, before they are added to the main tree. If you want to help out with this packag= e, i suggest you join #gentoo-hardened on freenode, since that is the place, where most of the = conversation is done. Additionally it might have been better to send this mail at least in CC t= o gentoo-hardened ML, since most interested and active people are only subscribed there. --=20 Thomas Sachau Gentoo Linux Developer --------------enig108ACE699C77AD3C37F90324 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iJwEAQEKAAYFAku3KDoACgkQG7kqcTWJkGdvrgP8CwhW09L3KRe0ZGS8PaGbWXdW 3cioHVafDkxOTJl1YOQn+xElv7FPiIdLrb3UpqXiZEBE4m7+sdisTBdcbvnvrtl9 ZxSlHTA7J+684tuvWdSJfSHW+DBAMAw4LjWa72FmM4CdNA4aR7oRTNo6UKISx9Jq LjPAEaxKRe6Mt87dm5I= =CZ1Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig108ACE699C77AD3C37F90324--