From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nxzzh-0001UG-1v for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 09:50:21 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82E2EE0917; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B634E0814 for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:50:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.197] (qiv5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.197]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D10CE2A83E for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB70F5E.7010101@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 12:50:22 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla? X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9A032C0C66053EDAD85F7FA2" X-Archives-Salt: 4af6fb93-fa1f-47ee-9799-3232fa49592c X-Archives-Hash: 9cb8abe1d6608e4fb4e525833eea897b This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9A032C0C66053EDAD85F7FA2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I don't think later is valid resolution. If there's a valid bug it just means it's never looked at again. If the bug is not valid then a different resolution should be used. So what do you think about disabling later? I would like to avoid things like this: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D113121#c21 Not applicable to the bug above but in general our social contract says: "We will not hide problems" Regards, Petteri --------------enig9A032C0C66053EDAD85F7FA2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLtw9hAAoJEPeUsk245OzwTsMQAIcrpJa9gkpLtQzV6PvtYjsz bQ9KHQTYidIZS5IKeiGslj3t/EOfs+9HJN1Ze4dR4yDwVGSVGFgp8NpELBZAyY/E xMU20cABZ82QzVbBTyv1dc5aoYthDo7ljlZSwwXoP5nlugA6SbNAgMBvrE2a0iq2 oXdtBNq1YyWmbVrur1/5p/RHCzhnOUIPZQngnUWXsp4Ngfq5GUZ57Pb0w+C+IDn+ KqK5A6ZBY3dC4lSyiyFVP/ejE5tu6kACZ1h1cznwoaDMGfAS71aThIXhm9+ztn7E 2+kL1totslNj5nNX79ZaPKQodVm+fDiVZ55sUlOWAnHqBwZYs+bn3ArLVC3zn61L 9+ti2q2LEm//JDclIgwHYdsh8axRthIzxhnmFLGiDxDFqyNTU9bjwF7O9fDOhaHz um/tz0I/D9uDVGmhbBOiuNA63Mdyf9ChMQNSs+jU2sX9oEA3EBnLibsXUfOqCAwF n5+MkCaqoaCCOyaIXefqwQoFOw1iI/Fo6c005KAx1REdawiiyPgcQJ9R65gtjWzA TtIxSFCvTo2h8tX2zBzWilZfG+7NyB153VM5+i8q4/wOZHklOUAvIm/LBppYwjFU TWTn4irqN0nbl/0/XJsyk5lL6MGBNMVdHgTc6zRrBoIP82izdm/ETUxJsvW4kQOF SVnqzVUn+Njct0pxJOov =d9Im -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9A032C0C66053EDAD85F7FA2--