From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NxzcT-0005nG-EW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 03 Apr 2010 09:26:24 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 249CAE0AF5; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69B7E0AEA for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:26:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (eom141.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.20.28.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F541B409F for ; Sat, 3 Apr 2010 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB709A9.2000103@gentoo.org> Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:26:01 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Is Gentoo dying? References: <1270286192.18734.3.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> In-Reply-To: <1270286192.18734.3.camel@homer.ob.libexec.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD45EAC86752F2E9EE1A150FA" X-Archives-Salt: fb7b452a-b594-4985-9df4-67165a9a86de X-Archives-Hash: 937d3a5b7dc2a695c9fac19f5d3c2793 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD45EAC86752F2E9EE1A150FA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 4/3/10 11:16 AM, Tobias Scherbaum wrote: > Hell no, but ... >=20 > We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way. > Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas wer= e > users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead. >=20 > For example: > - hardened-sources are nowadays only available in an experimental > overlay, lots of users keep asking what's happening to the > hardened-sources on both the -dev but also the -hardened mailinglist. I recently sent an e-mail to gentoo-dev, It seems that some work is being done, but there are people who volunteered to help, like me. What needs to be done with hardened-sources= ? Just a note: I'm using it on my servers, so I'm really interested in them being maintained, and I'm also able to test. --------------enigD45EAC86752F2E9EE1A150FA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAku3Ca0ACgkQuUQtlDBCeQKh6ACggfkYdLl6mn+QxFgT9DGcNXS9 8goAniPEv9NjIE5bDcdnWiOe56abyC04 =2GlI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD45EAC86752F2E9EE1A150FA--