From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx5XR-0006K9-BD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:33:25 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11BE7E0BE2; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:33:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89432E0BC7 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:33:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179018081.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.18.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07F41B403A for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB3BF9D.9010500@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:33:17 +0200 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100331 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Google Apps Standard Edition @ gentoo.org References: <4BB3B05F.4060700@gentoo.org> <201003311720.40465.vapier@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201003311720.40465.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c7b8e1cf-7fdf-4c69-b719-fdcb2d13c054 X-Archives-Hash: 171195d6cd349c3a21581a9a79dd7ba8 On 03/31/10 23:20, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 16:28:15 Sebastian Pipping wrote: >> To be very clear: Please take my vote against increasing dependencies on >> Google. > > so dont use it > >> On a side note: This is not a technical discussion only. >> As such please use gentoo-core for this next time. Thanks. > > incorrect ... it should either be gentoo-dev or gentoo-project. there is no > need for use of the closed gentoo-core list. > -mike did you even read all of my mail? i cannot "not use it" - that's my point. i'll be forced to, forced in or forced out. it's nothing for gentoo-dev as it's not purely technical. can it be more obvious? sebastian