From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nx5HB-0004Lc-Qv for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:16:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22215E0B3C; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6741BE07A2 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179018081.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.18.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B31721B40E0 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BB3BBA6.2020101@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 23:16:22 +0200 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100331 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Unnecessary logs: has_version to the rescue? References: <4BB3ABC8.7050207@gentoo.org> <20100331211904.0f49cae0@snowmobile> <4BB3B11A.1020505@gentoo.org> <4BB3B279.4060308@gentoo.org> <4BB3B3AC.2020009@gentoo.org> <4BB3B612.9090606@gentoo.org> <4BB3B8FF.80401@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4BB3B8FF.80401@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 1076e20c-f322-47f2-8a6c-416e7437b21c X-Archives-Hash: 9f3de73435fd3aa912446fcab6343bfa On 03/31/10 23:05, Zac Medico wrote: > Yeah, but the "same slot" thing is a little ambiguous since the > given atom could possibly match multiple slots that include the one > whose postinst is currently running. So, I'd make has_version > generate a QA warning if has_version is called there and the given > atom only matches the one whose postinst is currently running. Can you make a bug for it? Sebastian