From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NvqGg-0005NB-05 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:02:58 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD097E083D; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FC2E0831 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (qiw3.kyla.fi [82.130.46.203]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A0A132A876 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 2010 11:02:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BAF375F.4070105@gentoo.org> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 14:02:55 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: usemove [was Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: changing ssl use flag descriptions and unify behaviour] References: <4BAE1C33.6060604@gentoo.org> <20100328062705.GA7101@hrair.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <20100328062705.GA7101@hrair.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig82D2432591CCC733D8A31034" X-Archives-Salt: ba07e920-ad5f-434a-9332-3d84f6dd8e23 X-Archives-Hash: c0a9a0a0039201d7d126f42cffaf6900 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig82D2432591CCC733D8A31034 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/28/2010 09:27 AM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 01:03:43AM -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> I seriously hate changing USE flags for the sake of changing use >> flags. This provides a moderate amount of annoyance for anyone that >> maintains more then one Gentoo box because they need to then tinker >> with their /etc/make.conf and /etc/portage/package.use to get >> everything right again. And oh no what if the one box is on ~arch and >> one isn't and what if one is x86 and one isn't. Its just such a >> configuration nightmare. >> >> So unless there's any real benefit, I'm against this. >=20 > I'm not arguing for arbitrary changes, but if the change makes sense=20 > and isn't trivial it should be done. >=20 > What is needed is to tweak the tools for such a move- specifically=20 > adding a new command to the update machinery (profiles/updates). =20 > Something roughly like >=20 > usemove [atom] original_flag new_flag >=20 > If an atom is specified, the move applies only to w/in that pkg; if no = > atom, it's a global shift in the configuration (meaning all ebuilds=20 > now use gtk instead of gtk2 for example). >=20 Filed Future EAPI request: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D311731 >=20 > USE_EXPAND, roughly- I wouldn't say it's fully there, but it certainly = > would be where I'd start for any proposal... >=20 A good point. So how about renaming gnutls openssl and nss to ssl_implementation_* to make the usage clear? Regards, Petteri --------------enig82D2432591CCC733D8A31034 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLrzdjAAoJEPeUsk245OzwzcYQAJudZdJ1KccH2ibduWNMnSqu aC0ffsfrnC7kmvnaj0wA4WGYlQC94cALKF1EINJ1ECPwisqgoajGwlL3a57a2Eyo VwTYuIWYiO7iceivdcPd0JucxBKNUpHoWQ6FfqxB+XIWXdrcedspblD48t4kBJzR ja4LHeBaIDTeIxAlPlXywfnGftdlflTU73G6f1TjZ9enAR/0cAXLHlivyy9vG0Wq msljhliY/zulOShjKpXHGwVK3nluKW7fcv7e1dzgXjJClxBSNu+kaVOm+0875Stl pcjNwnQAbPyd4qkxMNoBdB7Mdt2jcZU859XL+v98zOcxRh8sxSV/Ma0RAuvlq/5C ruHnoLAdpZuzBeAUP8HsOXPPqArBb8AwL0uJmEwnL1UkLHPtnQ3p90fEBdasQLmI uLfyj9uRPq/sICJaJMmxkyW3SP/DHuuHxbsMQ0GLaDNWdIsLOccsln0uLbqrZrwI DJKoMH6lwmQwlHKkYYDaNg4GSQLnWRtudgV5o/jZgjbw+8yZS474U6HHYf7DIq0X oE+EGh3LMq3Ou2OFuHkF5BXQRaxaPZPyS8t4ryVobiJOblfqwncYLdr8TN1bMoBP R6SRZFnmLo+NXl1ETq8BdK6Q4+r4RboFMVyRN9geW/XsZDVxhdDhY0EtGwUnOhZ2 /T8QWhIDdJrDRVLfCnXu =rQiD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig82D2432591CCC733D8A31034--