[gentoo-dev] fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for

[gentoo-dev] fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for

[linux]

Hello,

I wanted to report that cinepaint (which as of today is not in
portage) compiles fine on my gentoo box which has been emerge-synced
only yesterday. It uses however not the fltk-2.0 which is emerged by
default but the version fltk-1.1.10. 

On the fltk website they say however that actually 1.1 is the stable
version, whereas fltk-2.0 is an experimental version which is not as
much maintained as 1.1. By the way, 1.3 is the development version.

In case anybody would like to take care of this, I won't be able to do
so during the next few weeks.

Regards, 

Gabriel

P.S.: I actually only tested the latest cvs version. I will test the
latest stable tarball and then see whether cinepaint is fully
functional, and will report back any problems I might encounter.

Re: [gentoo-dev] fltk version 1.1 is the one to go for

[Samuli Suominen]

On 03/25/2010 11:01 PM, linux@gabriel-striewe.de wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I wanted to report that cinepaint (which as of today is not in
> portage) compiles fine on my gentoo box which has been emerge-synced
> only yesterday. It uses however not the fltk-2.0 which is emerged by
> default but the version fltk-1.1.10. 
> 
> On the fltk website they say however that actually 1.1 is the stable
> version, whereas fltk-2.0 is an experimental version which is not as
> much maintained as 1.1. By the way, 1.3 is the development version.
> 
> In case anybody would like to take care of this, I won't be able to do
> so during the next few weeks.
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Gabriel
> 
> P.S.: I actually only tested the latest cvs version. I will test the
> latest stable tarball and then see whether cinepaint is fully
> functional, and will report back any problems I might encounter.
> 
> 

http://bugs.gentoo.org/278375 is for cinepaint, not the mailinglist, but
thanks anyway.

- samuli