From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NuUkW-0005bK-3i for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:52:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6DF8E0920; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A725E08F1 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.109] (aasp98.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.5.227.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB6F1B4008 for ; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4BAA5134.4000900@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 18:51:48 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?IlBhd2XFgiBIYWpkYW4sIEpyLiI=?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <201003241744.31105.Arfrever@gentoo.org> <201003241823.45019.Arfrever@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigF39FAF54C54F272BDC0C2A96" X-Archives-Salt: d77c65df-8dfb-42c2-98b7-56e4762af28c X-Archives-Hash: 9be6e1f9842c609bdb5e856556e00385 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigF39FAF54C54F272BDC0C2A96 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/24/10 6:35 PM, Ben de Groot wrote: >> All valid concerns about text already included in the news item have b= een >> addressed. We don't need to include any unofficial recommendations. >=20 > I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed disregarding the concerns > and recommendations of your fellow Gentoo developers. >=20 > CC'ing devrel because this is getting out of hand. I think it's a purely technical issue. The arguments against Python 3 are mostly in the form "I don't feel it's ready". If it can't be resolved on the list (some people want Python 3, some don't), shouldn't the council decide? "The elected Gentoo Council decides on global issues and policies that affect multiple projects in Gentoo." Pawe=C5=82 Hajdan jr --------------enigF39FAF54C54F272BDC0C2A96 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkuqUTgACgkQuUQtlDBCeQIN2QCeKYo5BvUc7+mCKDKXGarItRs8 +VUAnjI9Fi9jh/l1l6117zYumjLXJuh8 =h+Fl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigF39FAF54C54F272BDC0C2A96--