From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NqAO8-0002ow-3w for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:12 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70AD8E08FC; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from petteriraty.eu (host.petteriraty.eu [188.40.80.83]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ACA9E08C6 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.130.46.229] (qob5.kyla.fi [82.130.46.229]) by petteriraty.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 508A52AB0A for ; Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:19:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B9A936B.3070804@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:18:03 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyaSBSw6R0eQ==?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fi; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090916 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-dev] Handling of keywording bugs with only one arch X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 OpenPGP: id=B8E4ECF0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDEF8AC9AD7572C067E3C0D4F" X-Archives-Salt: e0a4ab7b-7c0f-4b51-ba70-2b376159183c X-Archives-Hash: 3f8603c9bc97b7b0bcf59782848c2650 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDEF8AC9AD7572C067E3C0D4F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable There seems to be two different schools on who to assign a keywording bug with only a single arch. I have myself assigned it to the arch in question but there's a difference of opinion here: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D272160#c5 Let's get agreed on a single approach and I will add a note here: http://devmanual.gentoo.org/keywording/index.html I naturally support the approach I have been doing as I think the arch team is the one in charge. Regards, Petteri --------------enigDEF8AC9AD7572C067E3C0D4F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJLmpNuAAoJEPeUsk245Ozw8hwQAJ2Ob6ZZe0wmaNKodLoXn9nd 0h2ixrtmH266Vl3Tm2SCdrYuG2yJl9VxOY9qQbwbQpSFITnCFBCgJyzB2LWbTido E61AxL+hMs0b6XNwyed6KI0C1EQN4AGDOV6SbVFkQ46gWrseaVXyRyz+E+HtBY3C euiIVgltnD/iN4uJ6L2nVluQbHaHsfT8RmJYAkxPmJry1FLWO1rOVNnjqaLiLlO/ l7EEj9sZluqx14Ouk1TICfNDv2Vuw5950CIWOmg1Y2G3CiLrJPZVsaT0fHS0zqJX 1Gu1N6XCvXcEcndmAVVwX0dAZNzj7cQyYZEf7rsUmla4NuajG4yJoJLQRbwkiq8T HWlbDG7MiYeOsMPN6mNgb4JKKso9egiHJg3yhKypOaroXjl0ExUTzN83a9ayS4X4 Gd2LRotAGajnTRGdaHgpl4wbK7mdGBylRUTcZvAdBIEcW/5iYZVn1NXDG4Aadhmw 4A6HERita1YRddKDP+KcVUsr0Eaw3SK6FJYwzVCTFpxdy5+c4gWr4jaKAqSS6hVh vXqg16pYA+KTHJS0hR0qe/Fmy92F5le9bDH68yFnGnc5+ovmM1ZDlj0FBG2galqu 82+j1LEsIoD/OV4wpZ68Tnz2bWwjXHAxqofhyAKM/GIvTlbdSgY/R+AXXvaF/Ald 3Tvkejl5LOOF017xIZ6Y =vdPh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDEF8AC9AD7572C067E3C0D4F--