From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39783-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NnP0U-0004Xi-CF
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 04:19:22 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 628F4E0E8D;
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:19:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com (mail-gw0-f53.google.com [74.125.83.53])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829F4E0D4D
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 04:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gwj19 with SMTP id 19so1452741gwj.40
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:19:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=OtOREUoKOte59OO+mZlkn/3GEyNA6NIZpgrvaeRQhKQ=;
b=sro0qf0XjCHZ7ftOiFv9tk2RrajcA+0wvbbnWs1j3BRjsIrfgJsCjeYdEUpya6cWz/
R7ImMhxUSPdx4//IhQ/M/DjBdz0SHeNYdhWOp0Bw7A+5SgGR3M9bNk91x+6VzJrtBHEk
YUDEuSyntNRveCucSDH+j10nEBjQMeqYVu3gI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=IUpoD4L6jxybRF4f1El8PqPp7BcrhU09tt7o6zzwUZESEaMEx1ewyx7axEY49tbWvN
TTsN8fxYzM+qu14y62+MmwvxUpPwCAv+C9rE2u+xcULYN9I6JtG4a9vtEi+h8ae+KaEx
VxpzuXm1hSQ2aAvFbU0no6kpItgYqBlwRuHMw=
Received: by 10.90.204.3 with SMTP id b3mr698470agg.80.1267762747821;
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.1] (adsl-0-94-66.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.94.66])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm526940gxk.12.2010.03.04.20.19.06
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:19:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B908639.3080802@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:19:05 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100304 Gentoo/2.0.3 SeaMonkey/2.0.3
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve
circular deps
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com> <e117dbb91003041539y27e27bbq6e5b2d197b49b586@mail.gmail.com> <4B9049A3.5020805@gmail.com> <201003050957.22890.mail@patrick-nagel.net> <4B906E7D.7010003@gentoo.org> <877hprpibg.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <877hprpibg.fsf@newton.gmurray.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: fdf1473b-b25b-4066-b121-6a1b4dbb97c3
X-Archives-Hash: 8ed191329446a89278c68d356ea5955b
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> Richard Freeman<rich0@gentoo.org> writes:
>
>
>> I think that is separate from the circular dependency issue. As long
>> as we have an unresolved circular dependency I think cups should be
>> off the list. However, I'd be the first to agree that this is a
>> short-term solution.
>>
>> The problem is that we only have two long-term solutions so far:
>>
>> 1. A smarter package manager that can work through these dependencies
>> automatically.
>>
>> 2. Splitting packages like poppler that have these issues.
>>
> Is there not a third, maybe obvious, solution to circular dependencies
> on initial install?
>
> 3. Include one or both of the packages in the stage tarball.
>
>
I'm not a dev but what else uses poppler or other packages that would be
added? Also, this would affect server profiles. Last I checked,
server, desktop or any other profile starts from the same tarball. It's
a idea but would it be a good one? I don't know the answer to that
question.
Is this a Gentoo thing or is this caused by upstream? I only use Gentoo
so maybe it affects other distros as well.
Dale
:-) :-)