From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39772-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1NnL4l-0006Kd-De
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:07:31 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 304BFE0E97;
Fri, 5 Mar 2010 00:07:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-yx0-f193.google.com (mail-yx0-f193.google.com [209.85.210.193])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A920E07B4
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 5 Mar 2010 00:07:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by yxe31 with SMTP id 31so1619307yxe.20
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:07:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=I24lUEAT99QPmFIxvrMhGXKrW5ZoUoLCJHGggjxcXbM=;
b=a49lI2H0ukKovlo5gFdBIX9M9TcXLOnCIjzxSv+jYSOZEp0qSHdyj7tbcZrXIN7oGF
0q8/MLlPYDBL0QaSJA0qxwKiJpJBoBkY0idbSnX+X1N2EK7RWyEUKMWJjokoJmTyBYvU
3BQHSK9sD6A2fAQWW9b27NIJGj1ogTlVyxrr8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=PYi9tOjUtaWByKRwbCWmLvXlLiQoNk2bWdZBHx/bxKKoUcMmJHU00Qr26xA6J4iYLG
m5tT9KdPYv821IfKdv2WDk+Azls8FDJYj/F1QZ8dACWlUn5gXg9mfO0o1kCya9FQu3x3
HnNFnxcEGzMafGVV4c6UvTn9/tSde8LqpowGg=
Received: by 10.101.167.36 with SMTP id u36mr638241ano.48.1267747640523;
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:07:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.1] (adsl-0-94-66.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.94.66])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 16sm384518gxk.9.2010.03.04.16.07.18
(version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:07:19 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B904B35.4000202@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:07:17 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100223 Gentoo/2.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve
circular deps
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com> <1267641936.26170.5.camel@localhost> <e117dbb91003031351q3f539e12r2be1281a2d0debc3@mail.gmail.com> <201003040756.48943.cla@gentoo.org> <20100303230807.2a1ac862@angelstorm> <e117dbb91003040428n4825f6edp2dfee97fd7bcbe35@mail.gmail.com> <pan.2010.03.04.17.04.16@cox.net> <24205fb6ca08a56f3d4d8b14ae72b0ee@jolexa.net> <e117dbb91003040953p2da68b84lf5c362fc0861c3b4@mail.gmail.com> <4B90489C.5000503@doublecreations.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B90489C.5000503@doublecreations.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 5250284b-be10-4858-8556-a25703f0f4a4
X-Archives-Hash: 5ded888c67c2ebd9b5ec79fed638c529
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> On 03/04/10 12:53, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Exactly. The last time I owned a printer is over 5 years ago. So I don't
>> think cups warrants to be in the standard desktop profile.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> I print almost daily, but I'm not sure if printers are commonplace
> enough for cups to be a default. Some users may expect it though.
>
> As for the circular deps, it would seem more logical to fix the
> problem at the source, rather than to cover it up for one subset of
> users.
>
>
I can't think of anyone that doesn't have a printer. All my friends and
family that has a computer has a printer. Heck, I had a printer hooked
up to my old Vic-20 for goodness sake. That was over 20 years ago.
He wants to remove the USE flag so that it hides the fact it is not
really fixed. If a person does their install as they should, the
problem will be right there for them to deal with. Of course, the user
will the one getting pointed at since they added the flag. It takes the
problem off the people that created it and adds it to the user. That is
not how it should be fixed.
Dale
:-) :-)