From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39760-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NnJH4-0006UQ-HN
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:12:06 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB31DE0B7F;
	Thu,  4 Mar 2010 22:12:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.146])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C184E0B57
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2010 22:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so69416qwa.10
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:11:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=dzpV2t8PzQw5u3kpssbh9Qq5x585729Vcfh5XhBgFG4=;
        b=Ev8gkNN0ean42gVmgVcxF6ICOYgY36ePknKZmYNwY6JdlrfYcP3bevRkItvcrflf3A
         7vR6zLfiPT62s02QIO8pBle1KBORGBrpbAJM/toSxcNlaghcMcSxXhJPzscnJd4fRhOy
         Gzzbqr9ESKwatrk9+7C/fAeMKAEiyzRJnuv9Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ooGLkqGvOLQHBCsSO//AvhSkCFeOR4/l99FSUT3nSbMltYAvKXgrJFfO0N3a1Ea5Mc
         MRpuaP3c7CMv2gBZQ/nGzqk9sufO0uvYiwRVzzWmTrwQTYgz5QfZDKJ2OcbuD4nItg+y
         yTU5kcukgtNAbQA+sGFtu5z8s1akCHDP58gak=
Received: by 10.224.110.2 with SMTP id l2mr1351489qap.164.1267740706032;
        Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.1] (adsl-0-94-66.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.94.66])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1077326qwb.30.2010.03.04.14.11.44
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:11:45 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B90301F.6000609@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:11:43 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100223 Gentoo/2.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve
 	circular deps
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com> 	<1267641936.26170.5.camel@localhost> <e117dbb91003031351q3f539e12r2be1281a2d0debc3@mail.gmail.com> 	<201003040756.48943.cla@gentoo.org> <20100303230807.2a1ac862@angelstorm> 	<e117dbb91003040428n4825f6edp2dfee97fd7bcbe35@mail.gmail.com> 	<4B90118F.4040101@gmail.com> <ea2499da1003041346p4a9f9c7au77a21e3d97bfe220@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <ea2499da1003041346p4a9f9c7au77a21e3d97bfe220@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: bfc8a581-7cc6-4066-a519-3f60302e5339
X-Archives-Hash: 996d3954ee40ebbce30b60ed1f7b0750

chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 21:01, Dale<rdalek1967@gmail.com>  wrote:
>    
>> Sounds like your argument is more like a opinion.  I built my desktop about
>>      
> Since people keep talking about not wanting cups disabled for the
> desktop profiles, can we at least agree that it should be disabled by
> default for the non-desktop profiles?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dirkjan
>
>    

To me, that makes sense.  It certainly seems more logical to do that.  
I'm of the opinion that a server profile should be very limited.  Let 
the user decide what kind of server they are going to have.  A desktop 
profile can be limited but should include the more common options.  
There may be things that would depend on what type of GUI you are 
running but that could be left up to the user and documented in the 
docs.  Let the user pick which path they want to go down.

Dale

:-)  :-)