From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnJH4-0006UQ-HN for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:12:06 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB31DE0B7F; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from qw-out-1920.google.com (qw-out-1920.google.com [74.125.92.146]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C184E0B57 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 22:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qw-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 14so69416qwa.10 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:11:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dzpV2t8PzQw5u3kpssbh9Qq5x585729Vcfh5XhBgFG4=; b=Ev8gkNN0ean42gVmgVcxF6ICOYgY36ePknKZmYNwY6JdlrfYcP3bevRkItvcrflf3A 7vR6zLfiPT62s02QIO8pBle1KBORGBrpbAJM/toSxcNlaghcMcSxXhJPzscnJd4fRhOy Gzzbqr9ESKwatrk9+7C/fAeMKAEiyzRJnuv9Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ooGLkqGvOLQHBCsSO//AvhSkCFeOR4/l99FSUT3nSbMltYAvKXgrJFfO0N3a1Ea5Mc MRpuaP3c7CMv2gBZQ/nGzqk9sufO0uvYiwRVzzWmTrwQTYgz5QfZDKJ2OcbuD4nItg+y yTU5kcukgtNAbQA+sGFtu5z8s1akCHDP58gak= Received: by 10.224.110.2 with SMTP id l2mr1351489qap.164.1267740706032; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.1] (adsl-0-94-66.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.94.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm1077326qwb.30.2010.03.04.14.11.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Mar 2010 14:11:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B90301F.6000609@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 16:11:43 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100223 Gentoo/2.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.0.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps References: <1267641936.26170.5.camel@localhost> <201003040756.48943.cla@gentoo.org> <20100303230807.2a1ac862@angelstorm> <4B90118F.4040101@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: bfc8a581-7cc6-4066-a519-3f60302e5339 X-Archives-Hash: 996d3954ee40ebbce30b60ed1f7b0750 chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 21:01, Dale wrote: > >> Sounds like your argument is more like a opinion. I built my desktop about >> > Since people keep talking about not wanting cups disabled for the > desktop profiles, can we at least agree that it should be disabled by > default for the non-desktop profiles? > > Cheers, > > Dirkjan > > To me, that makes sense. It certainly seems more logical to do that. I'm of the opinion that a server profile should be very limited. Let the user decide what kind of server they are going to have. A desktop profile can be limited but should include the more common options. There may be things that would depend on what type of GUI you are running but that could be left up to the user and documented in the docs. Let the user pick which path they want to go down. Dale :-) :-)