From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnIPE-0001zs-MA for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:16:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9564E0C07; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8232E0B11 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (e179041094.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.41.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246211B4041 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 21:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B902321.4020906@gentoo.org> Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:16:17 +0100 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item References: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <201003041923.17749.Arfrever@gentoo.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: a9e5e81b-600a-4908-91bf-437e94849d81 X-Archives-Hash: 6d8559ce7ef112ec5719982583589b04 On 03/04/10 19:22, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: > All problems, which were blocking stabilization of Python 3, have been fixed. > Stabilization of Python 3.1.2 is currently scheduled on 2010-04-19. #python on Freenode still reads "It's too early to use Python 3.x". Are they wrong? Are we at a point already where we can feed 90% of the Python 2.x code out there to Python 3 without problems? Has QA given their blessing to this? Personally I want "yes" three times to see you continue with Python 3 stabilization. Sebastian