From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-dev+bounces-39698-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1Nn0d4-0005ax-33
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:17:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 71697E0C88;
	Thu,  4 Mar 2010 02:17:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-gx0-f216.google.com (mail-gx0-f216.google.com [209.85.217.216])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49691E0C23
	for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  4 Mar 2010 02:17:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so799632gxk.9
        for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:17:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=Yr2uOHnlmmJVSUfhq4iVP4hDTtKSAnoL5G2vX/03TiM=;
        b=kWIu37wu5hV0flsO2Q9UkzL49IzdhdZOdl03ZL4fhClm8mSK6HgvValdHs6LYU0IhA
         r6+si9fMGZjfFnL6Csrmr3CXpzO5zjz6kA2DWDXC37W59SiUpNH9AI5izq+o+jH3nABa
         wXr6fOFtDS250G/4jbHG7025O54ybJP8B1+oY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ZRtnAdHILOarKOliYZWop2PegEQ4aMweZCUbki65er0HevBytfOYl7I7CpLGVfzduD
         Njiob6fQZq8KkXVDZr+2vXCP5HTVnVUiS3RBaBzkA1gx84Sxwhki0SibkZoLcO2d0oWg
         h6V/o/J9Fi3Vf78kjnDX/6ewJZfHlKUC4mQTA=
Received: by 10.101.45.9 with SMTP id x9mr814005anj.187.1267669041803;
        Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:17:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?192.168.1.1? (adsl-0-94-66.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.94.66])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 13sm3479077gxk.12.2010.03.03.18.17.20
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:17:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B8F182E.6080207@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 20:17:18 -0600
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100223 Gentoo/2.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.0.2
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve
 	circular deps
References: <e117dbb91003011324j1d3df0cfndc74d1e711b71fae@mail.gmail.com>	 <4B8C3438.90909@gentoo.org> <1267641936.26170.5.camel@localhost> <e117dbb91003031351q3f539e12r2be1281a2d0debc3@mail.gmail.com> <4B8EEE42.80306@gentoo.org> <4B8F1289.8040705@gmail.com> <4B8F1389.9040609@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <4B8F1389.9040609@gentoo.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: 4d6bc1d6-5514-406d-a5e0-3adfa4905101
X-Archives-Hash: 619046e7aff0fbf3003ff71e858374ea

chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> I'm not talking about selectively disabling cups. My proposal is
>    
>>>> to no longer enable the cups useflag in the base profile. I don't
>>>> think cups should be part of the base profile, and as a result
>>>> cascading to the desktop profile. And a lot of people seem to
>>>> agree. Users can always enable that functionality when they
>>>> need it. It is not something that is necessary for running a
>>>> desktop system.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> I agree that CUPS is not really necessary in the desktop profile, and
>>> especially in the base profile.  Many systems run desktop
>>> environments without needing printing support.  As we advance further
>>> toward a paperless computing experience, the need for printing
>>> support becomes even less.  And, as it is incredibly simple to add
>>> print capabilities by placing the cups USE flag in /etc/make.conf,
>>> that choice should be left to the user.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nathan Zachary
>>>        
>> One could argue the opposite as well.  Adding -cups to make.conf is
>> just as easy.
>>
>> I'm one of those lowly users.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)
>>
>>      
> I think that the point is that it is better to have it disabled by
> default so that new users do not run into these circular dependencies
> upon their first installation.  They can then add cups to their
> make.conf and emerge -avuDN world to get full printing support.
>
> Just as a sidebar, there is not a "lowly user."  Your input is greatly
> important in all matters regarding Gentoo as you are a member of the
> userbase.  It's your operating system too! :)
>
> Regards,
> Nathan Zachary
>
>    

Let just think of it this way.  I have to reinstall say from a dead hard 
drive.  I have copies of my make.conf and world file.  I install my new 
drive, download the tarball and unpack it.  I copy over make.conf and 
world.  Naturally cups will be enabled.  Then I sync and start to 
update.  Isn't that circular dependency still going to be there?  After 
all, this is how I install Gentoo even if from scratch.  I set my USE 
line before I start to emerge or update.

It seems to me, in my situation, this would not solve much.  Maybe I am 
incorrect in that.

Dale

:-)  :-)