From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmZHr-0002M3-Pl for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:05:52 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A14EE0C17; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:05:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3A5E063C for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (g225025240.adsl.alicedsl.de [92.225.25.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89031B417E for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 21:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4B8D7DA0.6050007@gentoo.org> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 22:05:36 +0100 From: Sebastian Pipping User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100228 Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Marking bugs for bugday? References: <4B889D1F.3040304@gentoo.org> <201002282154.35130.hwoarang@gentoo.org> <4B8ACC34.7000600@gentoo.org> <20100228173504.78eea0b1@angelstorm> <4B8D68CE.1050102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ed24ec10-d8f0-4dc3-9df8-fc3b281af4e3 X-Archives-Hash: ae5c65f468ec66ab95d14aef3f71ea61 On 03/02/10 21:47, Alec Warner wrote: > I would recommend not hardcoding 10 seconds; but otherwise caching is good ;) What do you propose? Sebastian